Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Franchise QB Dominates


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

So, you've never said he was the worst in NFL history or anything like that...

Right? 🤔

It depends on the context surrounding statement.   There have been times and context where he has been the worst.  

I also have zero interest in doing what you do right now.  Have a night

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Having to correct your inaccurate Matt Rhule take….isn’t wanting to talk about your Scott Fitterer defense.  It’s just correcting the record.  

Sure it is...

And I'm equally certain it's hot nothing to do with trying to distract that you're bading dogmatic takes on a game you didn't even watch 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Jamarcus Russell isn't that far back in history. 

Raiders moved on from Russell long ago Bryce.  Bryce is at 40+ starts.  Russell never sniffed that.  Raiders had less egg on their face than we do and didn’t give up the same assets for their bad QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

It depends on the context surrounding statement.   There have been times and context where he has been the worst.  

I also have zero interest in doing what you do right now.  Have a night

You could make "times and context" where Cam Newton was a terrible quarterback if you wanted.

(focusing on Super Bowl performance as a metric, for example)

Your takes are terrible, dude. My only question is whether that's deliberate this time or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Sure it is...

And I'm equally certain it's hot nothing to do with trying to distract that you're bading dogmatic takes on a game you didn't even watch 😄

I watched Shough outplay Bryce by a fair margin.  Again.

I watched Bryce make 2 horrible throws on the same drive as his 1 good throw

Canales is limited in how he calls a game because he has to factor Bryce heavily 

Bryce and Shough giving themselves up weren’t comparable 

we should of kicked the FG

What take did you have a problem with?  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

29% career win percentage for russell, 31% for Bryce. Big whoop 

Bryce couldn’t even play in the nfl while Jamarcus play playing. You take Jamarcus over Bryce every day of the week just because he can run the sneak. 

Johnny Manziel isn't exactly ancient history either.

All irrelevant though...

I don't give a rip where Bryce ranks historically. All that matters to me is that he isn't good enough to be our franchise guy right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You could make "times and context" where Cam Newton was a terrible quarterback if you wanted.

(focusing on Super Bowl performance as a metric, for example)

Your takes are terrible, dude. My only question is whether that's deliberate this time or not.

If you think my takes are terrible, that’s a high compliment.   I’d be worried if you agreed and thought they were smart.  I would need to do some soul searching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...