Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawks or Rams


Pantherxtreme
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don’t think it matters. Just off the intangible superstitious stuff, we are screwed. 

We have the Seahawks’ superiority over us that we just witnessed.  
We have beat the Rams once doubt we do it twice.

Our up down or win lose pattern/streak is still strong and would be intact if we were to beat TB meaning we are down the next game. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a tough one. Darnold did basically nothing against us but Stafford was able to move the ball on our defense. But that Seattle defense is elite. 

I think I still would rather see Darnold because this is the time of the year where he shines the dimmest. 

Neither game is a favorable matchup, that is for sure.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Pantherxtreme said:

This is my thinking as well.

Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers. 

I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win. 

Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend. 

If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 

Keep in mind it would be their 3rd consecutive road game. 
 

@ Carolina

@ SF

@ Carolina

Thats a lot of miles and time without a home game. Their last home game was December 18th

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we played Seattle 10 times, I could see us winning 3 of those. If we played the Rams 10 times, I feel like our one win a few weeks ago would be our only one. I mean it was a perfect storm and we still almost lost. Meanwhile we got tons of bad breaks/self inflicted wounds in Seattle and it was really only a big win due to turnovers that gave them short fields (plus Horn's facemask that turned a punt into points).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:


net, the Panthers will play, at home whichever team is seeded 5, same for the Bucs if the Panthers lose Sunday 

 

 

image.thumb.png.fd9dadec52ecdbe14396b0adf2a5e86d.png

First off we play tomorrow not Sunday, second thats not true even if we lose if the Falcons beat the saints we are in.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...