Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Someone's not gonna be happy

cranky

By cranky,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
Just now, Navy_football said:

Roger that. Site your references then. Or did you just make up some numbers and thought I'd say ok?

Buddy, I went through all 32 rosters, looked at production in 2025(hence why your assertion of who was or wasn't starters on the 49ers is laughable), looked at the NFL's official combine site and if they didn't run at the combine found at least 2-3 sources for each "Pro Day" and if that wasn't available I checked recruiting sites for HS 40 times.

How about you don't be a lazy fug and go look them up yourself instead of asking AI. 

That basically tells me you have zero idea what you are talking about. You even admit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Buddy, I went through all 32 rosters, looked at production in 2025(hence why your assertion of who was or wasn't starters on the 49ers is laughable), looked at the NFL's official combine site and if they didn't run at the combine found at least 2-3 sources for each "Pro Day" and if that wasn't available I checked recruiting sites for HS 40 times.

How about you don't be a lazy fug and go look them up yourself instead of asking AI. 

That basically tells me you have zero idea what you are talking about. You even admit it.

You do realize that AI doesn't "make numbers up" right? Everything listed there likely came from a Google search of info that was condensed into a smaller representation. 

Don't be an old fug and get with the times. If you're trying to sell Jameson Williams as a 4.5 guy, then you have no earthly clue what you're talking about. Literally just making ish up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

You do realize that AI doesn't "make numbers up" right? Everything listed there likely came from a Google search of info that was condensed into a smaller representation. 

Don't be an old fug and get with the times. If you're trying to sell Jameson Williams as a 4.5 guy, then you have no earthly clue what you're talking about. Literally just making ish up. 

You do realize that it's very often completely fuging wrong because it parses the top few Google selected results that might differ, be from completely ridiculous sources or just flat out be wrong, right?

Learn technology, dipshit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolinanimal Collaborator

carolinanimal

Posted
Posted
Just now, mav1234 said:

TMac isn't slow and is definitely not consideredably slower than Moose, lol.

Our problem with throws and completions past 10 yards is not due to lack of speed, lol.

Exactly. Our QB just doesn't throw down the field consistently. If he does throw it's to the outside and the boundaries and a moon ball. He doesn't have the velocity to hit the deeper stuff on a line or the second hole on cover 2. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

5. Agree with Adams and Puka. They are the only other example. Really good frigging example for your argument. But the only ones. 

This is also the dink and dunk era.  Deep ball era featured tons of 4.5 guys.  

Heck Bolden and Fitzgerald were both 4.6+ 40 guys.   Warner went deep. That was historical offense.  Brandon Marshall.  Demayrius Thomas.  Dez.   Lots of “slow” WRs get vertical.  It just takes a QB

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

You do realize that it's very often completely fuging wrong because it parses the top few Google selected results that might differ, be from completely ridiculous sources or just flat out be wrong, right?

Learn technology, dipshit.

You ignorant MOFO. You actually think you're smarter than AI? You actually think because you took 30 minutes to find info, running around multiple sites, when I let technology do it for me makes you smart and me a dipshit? You're dumber than I thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
Just now, Navy_football said:

You ignorant MOFO. You actually think you're smarter than AI? You actually think because you took 30 minutes to find info, running around multiple sites, when I let technology do it for me makes you smart and me a dipshit? You're dumber than I thought. 

Yeah, I do because I literally actually understand how a LLM works, especially in relation to a fuging search engine. You very clearly don't, which isn't even remotely surprising.

Let me guess, you are one of the people that talks to Grok or ChatGPT or whatever AI tool that you have no clue how to use properly all day, aren't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted

 

3 minutes ago, carolinanimal said:

Exactly. Our QB just doesn't throw down the field consistently. If he does throw it's to the outside and the boundaries and a moon ball. He doesn't have the velocity to hit the deeper stuff on a line or the second hole on cover 2. 

A burner on a go route would outrun his ball unless he threw it right away. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
Just now, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I do because I literally actually understand how a LLM works, especially in relation to a fuging search engine. You very clearly don't, which isn't even remotely surprising.

Let me guess, you are one of the people that talks to Grok or ChatGPT or whatever AI tool that you have no clue how to use properly all day, aren't you?

Nope. Just when I need to call out stupid ish from stupid folk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SOJA said:

It is truly wild seeing the Huddle's take on Bryce young vs. a huge chunk of Panthers twitter. 

I need for there to be a cross over episode where yall go to war. 

It’s wild the difference between the two. The ratios on Twitter when someone speaks negatively or even objectively about Bryce is absurd. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

You ignorant MOFO. You actually think you're smarter than AI? You actually think because you took 30 minutes to find info, running around multiple sites, when I let technology do it for me makes you smart and me a dipshit? You're dumber than I thought. 

AI is awesome.  It often performs like it is a mentally handicapped person at times.   It why there is always the disclaimer the info might be wrong and it essentially makes poo up 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolinanimal Collaborator

carolinanimal

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, strato said:

 

A burner on a go route would outrun his ball unless he threw it right away. 

Which is probably why we don't run much of those.😂 The we would have to either wait on the ball or it's overthrown because he has to throw early to get it to the spot. 

I think Kurt warners film breakdown really showed that there are bigger plays to be had and he doesn't take them. Either because he isn't comfortable or physically can't. Either way it is handicapping the offense 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • strato
      Where panthers draft ranked against Big Boards in 2023

      By strato · Posted

      Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • PleaseCutStewart
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By PleaseCutStewart · Posted

      Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...