Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce = Alex Smith


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, strato said:

6 of our last 8? Meaning we finished 2-6? Not sure that’s accurate. Check the math. 

I looked back and marked the Packers win as something of what we assumed would be a turning point for us. I missed the game we split with the Bucs. So 3-5 in the last 8 is correct. Slightly better. But still not at all ideal for how I expected us to finish the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

I looked back and marked the Packers win as something of what we assumed would be a turning point for us. I missed the game we split with the Bucs. So 3-5 in the last 8 is correct. Slightly better. But still not at all ideal for how I expected us to finish the season.

The reason I caught it was I was looking at next year and the annual Bryce suck fest to mark the beginning of the schedule, and thinking 2-6? Then we will be 2-8 in our last 10? Ugh. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, strato said:

The reason I caught it was I was looking at next year and the annual Bryce suck fest to mark the beginning of the schedule, and thinking 2-6? Then we will be 2-8 in our last 10? Ugh. 

that schedule next year is....rough

obviously we've still got games to play and the draft and FA but my lord. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

that schedule next year is....rough

obviously we've still got games to play and the draft and FA but my lord. 

 

yeah we will be sitting at the adult table for sure. Just might have lost two of our recent 1st round picks, long term, Saturday. Horn and the concussions, 2 in 6 weeks or something? 
Icky will be hard to replace and still be able to carry out whatever plans they had made for FA and the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Navy_football said:

You never know. Panthers played 7 playoff teams this season. I only see 6 for next season.

Went 2-5. Not including actual playoffs. So 2-6.  Rams and Green Bay were the wins. 
We were tough for teams, most of our games anyway. And we’re such a borderline playoff team. There will be a couple of teams out there that weren’t playoff teams that will hurt us probably. 

Too early to really say but I don’t like the way we stack up right now in our own division. They are all drafting well ahead of us (those that have picks). Atlanta might be in a little trouble. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Navy_football said:

You never know. Panthers played 7 playoff teams this season. I only see 6 for next season.

I just realized something and couldn’t edit above… post it here.

If you use the 2025 playoff teams to project 2026, you have to use 2024 teams to evaluate this year on those same terms. 

2024 playoff teams we faced this year were

TB (2)

Green Bay

Rams 

Bills  

I think that’s it. We went 3-3 including Saturday. 
 

5 games but only 4 teams. We can call it 5. 
 

So, more next year.  

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, electro's horse said:

Certainly higher profile but if think their recent track record of hires indicates they’re not well thought of us among the coaches. They’re also kinda weird about “culture hires” which is how you end up with guys like Joe Judge.

Falcons firing (promoting?) rich McKay again is a good move, and they have basically unlimited resources in Atlanta. Plus you get to play in the nfc south.

He also just might take a year off

Looks like it’s the Giants.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/47616292/sources-john-harbaugh-giants-expected-barring-setbacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No one's saying LaMelo has no blame we're responding to you acting like he's the reason they lost. The scapegoating and blaming the teams woes on his personality is where it's like Cam Newton all over again. It was a failure on multiple fronts and primarily Lee's. Dude said ON AIR pregame that they had to protect the paint and if that was his gameplan going in he couldn't have botched it more. As the commentators said Ball's a rhythm guy and Orlando was preventing him for getting any kind of flow going. I'm a normie watching on TV and said they needed to bait them into fouling to combat that. They didn't even try until the 2nd half when it was too late. I think it's fair to expect the star to overcome whatever but LaMelo was not the problem in that game and he's not what is holding the team back. He's the only reason they're flirting with being a great team. I kinda put the center play on Lee too. Moose is great until he's up against a big who can body him. We've always known that and that's what Kalkbrenner is for. I don't know if it would have changed much but Kalkbrenner should have had more minutes than him.  And moving forward with the center position, I just think it's the time to trade Diabate while his stock's high and that's not an indictment of his game. He's like an evolved combination of Biyombo and PJ. He's a great rim protector and the strength issue is just what you're going to have to deal with if you want that. But Kalkbrenner is perfectly capable of protecting the rim and we gotta get away from the undersized centers or it'll always be a problem for us.
    • Honestly its why that Jalen Coker grab was a big deal.  I'd been warming up to the idea of a sadiq pick and was adamantly against a receiver...but this altered my train of thought.  I mean For instance, Cade Otton signed for 3 yr 30 mil contract...thats not dramatically different than the rookie payscale for #19 (4 year 20 mil with 5th year option), however you KNOW otton is decent...no clue if Sadiq will be anything. 
×
×
  • Create New...