Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post-Draft: Gantt sets A stage, not THE stage. Perhaps Reset Your Expectations


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If you have a sub-.500 team and your 1st and 2nd rounders (honestly, I'd go as deep as 3rd rpund) aren't getting very significant playing time in their rookie season you done fuged up.

Biggest needs heading into off-season:

LT Edge ILB FS

Top FA pick up:

LT Edge ILB resigned FS

Top NEEDS/ Starter headed into NFL Draft:

DL FS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RJK said:

It has been pretty goofy watching people just pencil in Hecht and Wheatley as starters  like late rounders are plug and play 

C I can understand, people seem to really, really love Hecht (and to be fair his Senior tape is sensational). S I'm more dubious about, Evero seems to love him some Nick Scott and we're obviously not benching Moehrig as he's one of our best players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RJK said:

It has been pretty goofy watching people just pencil in Hecht and Wheatley as starters  like late rounders are plug and play 

Canales said we don’t draft for depth, but we surely are doing that. Starters in waiting so to speak.  
I don’t mind that. They say for every rookie you start you take one loss, rule of thumb. 
I think we should get nice bumps from Lloyd and Phillips and am expecting to see a better Scourton. He was very young for a starter - he was 20 when we drafted him, turned 21 in late August. Not even finished growing.  
You have the secondary with a good year together, I thought there were some communication issues or blown assignments early last year that should be well worked out by the start of the schedule. 
I am not real worried about the defense.  Hopefully they can get the young guys worked in by the home stretch and be a decent D. 
 

I definitely see some red flags with the offense. This line will likely take some time to gel. And more than I am thinking if they decide to go with Freeling. 
The running backs, we just don’t know what half of them are and they depend on that line too. And half that we do know, well Chuba obviously fell off last year and we don’t know if that was just from injury or an overall decline. We like to think injury and hope he is healthy this year, but who knows. 

If Idzik and Bevell add a lot of new stuff that could come with growing pains. 
And if we add in the annual ‘damn, I really suck at this’ start from Young, it could be a slow start for the offense.  

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Biggest need was, and remains, QB.

I felt like it was the OL, closely followed by QB. And today, in the present, yeah QB. He has limited us so much. 
I am looking forward to see what adjustments Bevell brings, and what Idzik does. Will they be able to get more out of him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...