Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kiper has PP #1 on his new big board


teeray

Recommended Posts

6,4(based on what I've read recently and others have said, haven't watched a ton of him, only the big games),1, and 8 if it's a quarterback for me. The only player on that list I would be unhappy about tho would be Bowers due to the recent injury. I also don't trust Fairley for some reason.

Prefer to stay away from quarterback.

Don't really care where Kiper has people but it will be funny to see people dismiss it who were heralding his comments a week or two ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are taking QB let me know where Colin K (Can't spell that fuggers last name and don't wanna look it up) is and that would be my #. 4,6,1, and ##

I really like Kaepernick, but I don't see us being in a position to take him since he'll probably go in the 2nd round. I dont think Kiper has him in the first, unless he's a recent addition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like Kaepernick, but I don't see us being in a position to take him since he'll probably go in the 2nd round. I dont think Kiper has him in the first, unless he's a recent addition.

Yeah I'd only want him in like the 5th.

Palmer/Moore/Colin is my dream stable next year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can not imagine him falling to the fifth unless he is waaay overhyped. He COULD fall to the top of the 3rd though. Honestly I might even take him in the third if he interviews well. He's a big project.

tbh, I think a stable of Volek/Clausen/Kaepernick is more likely than that, but it'd be nice to have Palmer playing for us and we already know Moore is a great backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can not imagine him falling to the fifth unless he is waaay overhyped. He COULD fall to the top of the 3rd though. Honestly I might even take him in the third if he interviews well. He's a big project.

tbh, I think a stable of Volek/Clausen/Kaepernick is more likely than that, but it'd be nice to have Palmer playing for us and we already know Moore is a great backup.

We'd definitely enter the Luck sweepstakes with that stable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...