Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Salary Floor implications


Stumpy

Recommended Posts

There has been a lot of talk, lately, about available veteran free agents and whether or not JR is teh cheap. I thought it would be interesting to take a look at the projections of what the new salary cap/floor will look like, and how it might affect our off-season moves.

First off, with the contracts currently on the books, our cap figure would be right around $70 million. With the new salary floor being projected anywhere from $120-135 million.

Going on the lower end of the spectrum, that leaves us roughly $50 million that we must to spend to reach the salary floor. If you account for Kalil's franchise tender and JShock's contract, that number moves to about $37 mil. Assuming we re-sign Williams, Johnson, Davis and Anderson, I would expect them to come in around $20 mil.

Now we are down to +/- $17 mil. Depending on a rookie scale, our draft picks will probably account for about $6-10 million. (Most 'experts' believe that, regardless of the pay scale, 1st round picks won't garner the huge contracts of the past couple years.)

That leaves us with about $7-11 million that we must spend to comply with league rules. This means that we are likely to pick up at least one high-end FA or, more likely IMO, 2-3 mid-level guys a la Shockey. So get your wishlists ready...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there has been a lot of talk, lately, about available veteran free agents and whether or not jr is teh cheap. i thought it would be interesting to take a look at the projections of what the new salary cap/floor will look like, and how it might affect our off-season moves.

First off, with the contracts currently on the books, our cap figure would be right around $70 million. With the new salary floor being projected anywhere from $120-135 million.

Going on the lower end of the spectrum, that leaves us roughly $50 million that we must to spend to reach the salary floor. If you account for kalil's franchise tender and jshock's contract, that number moves to about $37 mil. Assuming we re-sign williams, johnson, davis and anderson, i would expect them to come in around $20 mil.

Now we are down to +/- $17 mil. Depending on a rookie scale, our draft picks will probably account for about $6-10 million. (most 'experts' believe that, regardless of the pay scale, 1st round picks won't garner the huge contracts of the past couple years.)

that leaves us with about $7-11 million that we must spend to comply with league rules. This means that we are likely to pick up at least one high-end fa or, more likely imo, 2-3 mid-level guys a la shockey. So get your wishlists ready...

[attach]34408[/attach]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way teh floor is $120 try around 80 million with the Cap being around $120.

Yeah I don't see the floor being that high.

If the calculations of the floor, in respect to the cap, are similar to the previous model, the floor will be roughly 90% of the cap.

And as for a $120 million cap, without even counting franchise tags or re-signing any players, 5 teams would already be over that number. When you add draft picks alone to that, another 5 would likely break $120 mil.

Edit: Based on that link, we are at $73 million before Shockey and the Franchise Tag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the calculations of the floor, in respect to the cap, are similar to the previous model, the floor will be roughly 90% of the cap.

And as for a $120 million cap, without even counting franchise tags or re-signing any players, 5 teams would already be over that number. When you add draft picks alone to that, another 5 would likely break $120 mil.

Edit: Based on that link, we are at $73 million before Shockey and the Franchise Tag.

Those 5 teams will have to cut players. Last cap year accord to the link you posted was 2009 that cap was $130 million. Owners will get concessions so you can figure the cap will be around $120. Look at 2006 the cap was $94 million. So between $94 million and $130 million will be the cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those 5 teams will have to cut players. Last cap year accord to the link you posted was 2009 that cap was $130 million. Owners will get concessions so you can figure the cap will be around $120. Look at 2006 the cap was $94 million. So between $94 million and $130 million will be the cap.

The cap is based on league income from the year prior. Therefore, this years cap will be based on the $9 billion in income once it has been redistributed.

Under the last CBA ($1 billion off the top +40% for owners and 60% for players) it works out to $4.2 bil for the owners and $4.8 bil for the players. The owners have said they would like to reverse that number by taking another $1 bil off the top.

Based on that formula you have $7 bil left over. Split the same 60-40 for the players, you get $4.8 billion to the owners and $4.2 billion for the players.

$4.2 bil divided by the 32 teams comes up with a cap number of approx. $131.25 million. Leaving a floor number of about $118 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cap is based on league income from the year prior. Therefore, this years cap will be based on the $9 billion in income once it has been redistributed.

Under the last CBA ($1 billion off the top +40% for owners and 60% for players) it works out to $4.2 bil for the owners and $4.8 bil for the players. The owners have said they would like to reverse that number by taking another $1 bil off the top.

Based on that formula you have $7 bil left over. Split the same 60-40 for the players, you get $4.8 billion to the owners and $4.2 billion for the players.

$4.2 bil divided by the 32 teams comes up with a cap number of approx. $131.25 million. Leaving a cap number of about $118 million.

The Split wont be 60-40. look for it to be closer to 53-47 players/owners. The players are going to give some money back to the owners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Split wont be 60-40. look for it to be closer to 53-47 players/owners. The players are going to give some money back to the owners.

I absolutely could be wrong on this, but, from what I have read, I have understood it that the league wants to flip the overall money, not percentages. I believe that the 53-47% split that has been floated is assuming the players won't go for the extra $1 billion. That would again give you, roughly, $4.2 bil to the players and $4.8 to the league.

If you have read anything to the contrary, I would love to read it. This whole situation has become extremely convoluted and hard to grasp. I'm not sure we will really know anything until a deal gets done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming that the players' share of the revenue is around $4.2 (approximately equivalent to a cap of $131.25M for each team) the players would be conceding about half a billion dollars in revenue to the owners. that would amount to more than 10% pay cut on an overall basis as far as the players are concerned. I don't think the owners can expect more than that.

I think a salary cap of roughly $130M is realistic. You go down to $125M and that amounts nearly a 20% decrease in players' revenue compared to the previous CBA. I can't imagine the players accepting that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richardson--the crazy man who slashed costs last season (and I am still upset about it)--has us in good shape. There is still speculation that Steve Smith wants out, and if he leaves, that is an additional (guessing) $8 million, of course, he would have to be replaced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that list is "only for players currently under contract for the 2011 season".

So you also have to consider what that money buys. As of that date the Panthers had only 39 players under contract for 2011. Shockey makes it 40. If and when Kalil signs his franchise tag that will make 41.

So, then they have to fill out the rest of the roster, add in the "dead money", the practice squad, and have a considerable cushion left to add players throughout the long season to replace injured/IR'd players.

The money will spend up fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 active cotracts + Jshock and Kalil we're up to 41. Dwill, CJ, TD and Anderson make 45. We have seven draft picks which brings us up to 52. Add in one free agent and you've got a 53 man roster.

So, we have $37 million to reach the projected floor, and 12 slots to fill out the roster. I think it is very likely that we, at the very least, re-sign our core guys (Williams, Johnson, Anderson and TD) while possibly adding another FA or 2.

Does the PS count against the cap? I've never been clear on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...