Mallett Workout Tuesday

[stirs]

Funny you should say that. Last year a lot of experts didn't think Sam Bradford was "a Sam Bradford".

Pretty much everyone knew Rams were going with Sam Bradford

this year, if Luck was in the draft, everyone would know we were going with Luck

i just don't think we should make a mega reach for anyone, especially a QB, especially in a year when he will get no offseason tutoring whatsoever

[teeray]

And you base this opinion on...lemme guess, draft expert opinions?

The team has its own scouting department. They don't care what Kiper, Mayock or anyone else says.

They could very easily be considering Mallett for the #1. We wouldn't know.

You can't definitively judge what the Panthers will do based on outside sources.

I wouldn't pick him number one either, but then I also wouldn't have wanted Chuck Wiley and Mitch Marrow over Leonard Little. The Panthers did.

I base SO MUCH on outside opinions that I have been saying for two weeks now that Mallett would go no later than 12.

Show me where the outside experts have said that??

I study the QBs myself. I read some of their stuff but I do the majority of my studying on QBs myself.

[teeray]

Pretty much everyone knew Rams were going with Sam Bradford

this year, if Luck was in the draft, everyone would know we were going with Luck

i just don't think we should make a mega reach for anyone, especially a QB, especially in a year when he will get no offseason tutoring whatsoever

No they didn't. As a matter of fact people weren't even sure if Bradford would be the first QB picked.

Even after Bradford did so well at his pro day the Rams weren't sure they were going to take him. AT least that is what they said publicly

[teeray]

Everyone knew by the draft they were taking Bradford. But after the combine a lot of people thought it was going to be Suh.

[stirs]

The only intrigue leading up to the draft is which DT would go first. McCoy or Suh

[mav1234]

there were articles before the draft speculating Bradford could fall to the middle of the first, where Hurney would trade up to grab him. No joke.

By the time the draft came sure we knew it'd be a QB, but in the months before hand we didn't.

[teeray]

The only intrigue leading up to the draft is which DT would go first. McCoy or Suh

That was because the Rams pretty much announced they were taking Bradord several weeks before the draft. Before they said as much people didn't think a guy coming from a non-pro style offense with injury issues was worth the number one pick.

[micnificent28]

Mallet in the first round=fail peroid.

[teeray]

Mallet in the first round=fail peroid.

I think it is a lock at this point. JMO.

I also think he will get picked ahead of Locker. I think Locker falls down and either gets picked up by Seattle at 25 or somewhere in the 2nd

[Nicbsbll2]

I think it is a lock at this point. JMO.

I also think he will get picked ahead of Locker. I think Locker falls down and either gets picked up by Seattle at 25 or somewhere in the 2nd

Is Seattle in the market for a QB? After the contract they gave Whitehurst, and the way he played at the end of the season, I would think they would be happy sticking with him and Hass for a while.

[stirs]

Thinking the Redskins will take Ponder in the second.

Bank it

[TheRealDeal]

It's crazy how the Newton huggers will defend every off field issue he has that has been reported but they attack Mallet for an issue that no one can really substantiate.

Newton has real issues, Mallet has been accused of issues with no proof yet the Huggers sling it all around

[DaCityKats]

newton has been accused of his off field issues as well so trd dont try that.

we get it, you dont like newton.

[TheRealDeal]

newton has been accused of his off field issues as well so trd dont try that.

we get it, you dont like newton.

But there is factual evidence you can look back on for Newton and actual sanctions in place.

Mallet is just a bunch of rumors that you guys are running with.

You got upset when we brought them up with Cam but now you are bringing up less credible accusations against Mallet.

I don't like either of them, I just don't think it's fair to Mallet when they haven't been cited as to the source or proven factual.