Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mallett Workout Tuesday


pantherfan81

Recommended Posts

Funny you should say that. Last year a lot of experts didn't think Sam Bradford was "a Sam Bradford".

Pretty much everyone knew Rams were going with Sam Bradford

this year, if Luck was in the draft, everyone would know we were going with Luck

i just don't think we should make a mega reach for anyone, especially a QB, especially in a year when he will get no offseason tutoring whatsoever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you base this opinion on...lemme guess, draft expert opinions?

The team has its own scouting department. They don't care what Kiper, Mayock or anyone else says.

They could very easily be considering Mallett for the #1. We wouldn't know.

You can't definitively judge what the Panthers will do based on outside sources.

I wouldn't pick him number one either, but then I also wouldn't have wanted Chuck Wiley and Mitch Marrow over Leonard Little. The Panthers did.

I base SO MUCH on outside opinions that I have been saying for two weeks now that Mallett would go no later than 12.

Show me where the outside experts have said that??

I study the QBs myself. I read some of their stuff but I do the majority of my studying on QBs myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much everyone knew Rams were going with Sam Bradford

this year, if Luck was in the draft, everyone would know we were going with Luck

i just don't think we should make a mega reach for anyone, especially a QB, especially in a year when he will get no offseason tutoring whatsoever

No they didn't. As a matter of fact people weren't even sure if Bradford would be the first QB picked.

Even after Bradford did so well at his pro day the Rams weren't sure they were going to take him. AT least that is what they said publicly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there were articles before the draft speculating Bradford could fall to the middle of the first, where Hurney would trade up to grab him. No joke.

By the time the draft came sure we knew it'd be a QB, but in the months before hand we didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only intrigue leading up to the draft is which DT would go first. McCoy or Suh

That was because the Rams pretty much announced they were taking Bradord several weeks before the draft. Before they said as much people didn't think a guy coming from a non-pro style offense with injury issues was worth the number one pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is a lock at this point. JMO.

I also think he will get picked ahead of Locker. I think Locker falls down and either gets picked up by Seattle at 25 or somewhere in the 2nd

Is Seattle in the market for a QB? After the contract they gave Whitehurst, and the way he played at the end of the season, I would think they would be happy sticking with him and Hass for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's crazy how the Newton huggers will defend every off field issue he has that has been reported but they attack Mallet for an issue that no one can really substantiate.

Newton has real issues, Mallet has been accused of issues with no proof yet the Huggers sling it all around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

newton has been accused of his off field issues as well so trd dont try that.

we get it, you dont like newton.

But there is factual evidence you can look back on for Newton and actual sanctions in place.

Mallet is just a bunch of rumors that you guys are running with.

You got upset when we brought them up with Cam but now you are bringing up less credible accusations against Mallet.

I don't like either of them, I just don't think it's fair to Mallet when they haven't been cited as to the source or proven factual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...