Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did Goddell lie to the owners?


Highlandfire

Recommended Posts

I am thinking so after reading this. It seems to insinuate the NFL lied about the actual percentages which made the owners want to opt out of the CBA.

IF, and its a big if, this is true then the owners need to fire Goddell immediately.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/F/FBN_NFL_LABOR_THE_NUMBERS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-03-21-12-19-36

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The owner's are the one's lying to the players. They have constantly said that the players got 70%+ on the total revenue's.. but they got that calculation by not counting the $1 billion the owners get off the top.. which is very conniving imho. The owners have a sweet deal, only giving the players around 50% of total revenues. They should leave it as is, and just install a rookie wage scale and redivert the saving to the veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I just went over the article real quick on my way to class...

I seem to be missing the part where Goddell lied. Little help?

I see what hes talking about

Goodell said something about the revenue problem a year ago which made owners like JR say oh sh*t and they start panicking and tank the season so they can lock the players out

the article has some calculations that shows that the NFL is wrong about their revenue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like they are adding the 1 billion, that was agreed to come off the top. Rather is is counted it or not, is the issue. Since the union agreed (if you agree with something, you shouldn't take it back later, right?) to let the owners take off the top, it should not be counted. A good article would have gave the totals BOTH ways....just saying. either way both are wrong..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the numbers being wrong come down to how much does it cost the NFL to host all the games in a given season. Clean up cost and so forth for 512 games not counting playoffs and such.

I know that the Forbes article shows that the profits for the teams averages out to around 20million a year with a couple teams being in the negative in profits over the last few seasons.

The Dolphins situation is pretty bad as well with them being around 400 million in debt because of stadium issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- In 2005, player costs were $3.32 billion, and all revenue was $6.49 billion;

Union way = 51%

Owners (taking the billion off the, as agreed) = 61%

- In 2006, the first year under the just-expired CBA, player costs rose to $4.1 billion, an increase of $780 million, which is 61 percent of that year's $1.28 billion increase in all revenue to $7.77 billion;

Union = 53%

Owners (as per agreement) = 61%

- By 2009, player costs were $4.5 billion, while all revenues were $8.88 billion.

Union= 51%

Owners (exactly what does the contract say, in this matter?)= 57%

All the talk about "lockout" probably help sales (certainly help the ratings), this particular year.

As I said, both are in the wrong. Players for agreeing to let the owners take a billion off the top and then wanting to count it (in their favor). Owners for not checking their own numbers and/or fudging them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...