"We're 60 percent of the way along." - Rivera

[ncbobcat]

Understand what you mesn, but the group they have there aren't morons.

I may disagree with them on this point, but all of the guys they have on there are people Id say are worth listening to.

I'm just ready for the draft to actually get here so we can talk about the actual draft picks rather than who the talking heads say we should take. It's to the point now I hardly click any links reagrding the draft because, in a nutshell, it's a rehashed summary of what a dozen other media types have already surmized about this team's top pick.

[CAVSS]

I respect your opinion Mr. Scott but I honestly don't think anyone in this draft would have gone #1 in any other draft in recent history. Well maybe Oakland would have gone crazy over Cam.

[ncbobcat]

I fail to understand your logic here. You are saying that it is stupid to take a QB early in a draft where there aren't many high potential QB's. Instead we should draft a WR, DT, or DB in the first round because there are so many available.

If I felt DT was our biggest need and there were only 2 good looking DT's in this draft THEN I would suggest going for one in the first round. If we needed a QB and there were a large amount of talented QB's then I would assume there would be quality left in the later rounds.

PS In last years draft Dareus would have been lucky to be the 3rd DT taken.

And PP7 would probably not gone before Eric Berry.

Fact is anyone we take at #1 in this draft is a reach.

The QB class is so weak in my opinion, that we would our waste our top pick going QB. In other words, you don't draft a QB just for the sake of drafting one when the quality isn't obviously there.

The other spots are deep, so you select one and later other spots with the intent of getting a good guy deeper in the draft.

[Hoenheim]

haha, I should have titled my thread "ARGUE ABOUT WHO YOU WANT TO DRAFT!"

[Mr. Scot]

I respect your opinion Mr. Scott but I honestly don't think anyone in this draft would have gone #1 in any other draft in recent history. Well maybe Oakland would have gone crazy over Cam.

The argument could be made that it's a weak draft, especially at the QB spot, but I still think Peterson would be an elite prospect regardless.

[ncbobcat]

haha, I should have titled my thread "ARGUE ABOUT WHO YOU WANT TO DRAFT!"

Yup, about 70% of the threads for the past two months could have that title, 90% since the lockout started.

[CarolinaVeins]

Yup, about 70% of the threads for the past two months could have that title, 90% since the lockout started.

Any thread you do about the draft nowadays are gonna end up the same. There are like 3 or 4 active threads with different titles same agruement

[SOJA]

LT, LG, C, RT (if otah healthy), RB, LB, Safety,

we need a: QB, DT, DT, CB, WR (if smitty gone), RG in that order in my opinion

[SOJA]

That's why see my sig, if we can trade down and get Newton and Hurney and co. believe in him or Gabbert I'll be happy

[Cat'sGrowl]

It lost credibility when it said we have no strengths.

[SOJA]

oh and fruckyou Andrew Luck, I am still disappoint

[Hoenheim]

well, if d-will and j-stew don't go anywhere, we are set at running back for 5 more years I think..

[Hoenheim]

jeez, I wish jimmy would just go ahead and morph into peyton manning so we can focus on other positions in the draft lol

[jtnc]

We still need to make sure CJ is locked up.