Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The John Fox Mentality. Cmon


Panthro

Recommended Posts

3 of those 4 teams picked a qb in the 1st round. one had a pro bowler and still went with a qb. so 3 teams gambled and it worked.

Brady, no discussion here, 6th rounder. Rodgers, later first round pick like Ben, but sat for 4 years while a HOF QB tutored him. Big Ben had a playoff calibre team supporting him. He was told *gasp* just to manage the game.

Peyton Manning is the only straw you all have to grasp at and he has just as many wedding rings as Super Bowl rings....one. I dare say the Colts haven't sucked during his tenure at Indy either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a team that many consider the worst run team in the NFL recovered pretty quickly...thanks.

Explain how this group is any different then Stafford, Sanchez, and Freeman. All of which we would be happy to have as our QB.

Thanks for proving that we can win more quickly shoring up other holes and bringing in a veteran QBs. Thanks for also proving that the Raiders weren't actually that bad of a team while JaMarcus was there and it was a rookie QB experiement gone bad that was holding them back. All it took was some competant QB play to turn their record around.

Sanchez and Stafford have not shown much thus far. They had more hype coming out of college though. Freeman has been better than I expected, I'll give you that. Oh, wasn't Freeman the latest of those three drafted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for proving that we can win more quickly shoring up other holes and bringing in a veteran QBs. Thanks for also proving that the Raiders weren't actually that bad of a team while JaMarcus was there and it was a rookie QB experiement gone bad that was holding them back. All it took was some competant QB play to turn their record around.

Sanchez and Stafford have not shown much. They had more hype coming out though. Freeman has been better than I expected. Oh, wasn't Freeman the lastest of those three drafted?

So says the John Fox mentality.

And to your second paragraph...lol ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the team decides not to select a QB with the frist pick does that mean they still have the John Fox mentality? It seems that Rivera, to this point, is quite a bit different than fox in terms of what he says at least. But what if they literally don't think a QB is the best way to use the pick?

And I wouldn't be happy with Stafford if I were a Lions fan. It's not that I'm thinking he's no good, but that doesn't change the fact he hasn't been much of a payout in terms of the investment. I wouldn't want a Sanchez at all with a #1 pick. Put him on a week team and you'd have a completely different view of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So says the John Fox mentality.

And to your second paragraph...lol ok

Wait, the Jets made the playoffs, right? I got it, but was that because of QB play or in spite of it? Stafford has played decently, but to #1 overall potential? Nope, not yet at least. Blame it on the Lions if you will, but I'll point you right back to the Raiders example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the team decides not to select a QB with the frist pick does that mean they still have the John Fox mentality? It seems that Rivera, to this point, is quite a bit different than fox in terms of what he says at least. But what if they literally don't think a QB is the best way to use the pick?

I would be surprised to tell you the truth.

My opinion. If they stay at #1 they will pick a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brady, no discussion here, 6th rounder. Rodgers, later first round pick like Ben, but sat for 4 years while a HOF QB tutored him. Big Ben had a playoff calibre team supporting him. He was told *gasp* just to manage the game.

Peyton Manning is the only straw you all have to grasp at and he has just as many wedding rings as Super Bowl rings....one. I dare say the Colts haven't sucked during his tenure at Indy either.

the point was that they still gambled on a QB in the 1st round. Favre did not tutor Rodgers either, Rodgers might have taken it upon himself to watch Favre but he did not play the mentor role. The steelers would not have won that 2nd ring 3 years ago if it wasnt for Bens game winning TD throw.

Like i said 3 out of the 4 teams that was listed picked a QB in the 1st round. and now those 3 are considered to be FQB's.

o and throwing for 500+ plus yards in a game is a helleva game manger. gasp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a team that many consider the worst run team in the NFL recovered pretty quickly...thanks.

Explain how this group is any different then Stafford, Sanchez, and Freeman. All of which we would be happy to have as our QB.

Uhm, they are at best what this whole thread is trying not to be. Congrats for recognizing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the point was that they still gambled on a QB in the 1st round. Favre did not tutor Rodgers either, Rodgers might have taken it upon himself to watch Favre but he did not play the mentor role. The steelers would not have won that 2nd ring 3 years ago if it wasnt for Bens game winning TD throw.

Like i said 3 out of the 4 teams that was listed picked a QB in the 1st round. and now those 3 are considered to be FQB's.

My point, how many of those guys were drafted #1 overall? Manning. How many Superbowls does he have? One. It's less of a risk, capwise, to take a QB outside of the top 10. If you have to part ways because of a bust pick, it won't hurt the franchise nearly as bad. The Cam nuthuggers want him #1 overall and given how raw and developmental of a project he is, it's a huge risk monetarily and to the team's prosperity if he doesn't pan out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peyton Manning was considered the 'safe pick' between him and Ryan Leaf. Ryan Leaf was the guy with more upside, with a stronger arm, also he has character concerns. We all know the ending to that story. The Colts did indeed play it safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhm, they are at best what this whole thread is trying not to be. Congrats for recognizing that.

If we were fine with 8-8 Fox would still be here. We've averaged 8-8 for the last 9 years. There's a risk with every pick. We aren't the Raiders. We could recover rather quickly if picking Newton fails. The reward outweighs the risk in this instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point, how many of those guys were drafted #1 overall? Manning. How many Superbowls does he have? One. It's less of a risk, capwise, to take a QB outside of the top 10. If you have to part ways because of a bust pick, it won't hurt the franchise nearly as bad. The Cam nuthuggers want him #1 overall and given how raw and developmental of a project he is, it's a huge risk monetarily and to the team's prosperity if he doesn't pan out.

#1 or #18 they still gambled and took a QB in the first.it just so happens that we have the first pick so if you are high on a prospect you take him. According to Rahiem Morris if they had the 1st pick they would have taken Freeman.

Some people are tired of having a game manger and actually want a QB who can win a game by himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point, how many of those guys were drafted #1 overall? Manning. How many Superbowls does he have? One. It's less of a risk, capwise, to take a QB outside of the top 10. If you have to part ways because of a bust pick, it won't hurt the franchise nearly as bad. The Cam nuthuggers want him #1 overall and given how raw and developmental of a project he is, it's a huge risk monetarily and to the team's prosperity if he doesn't pan out.

And if he does. Boy, I'm glad we took the chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...