Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is with the phrase anti-Cam loverers?

jarhead

By jarhead,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jarhead Newbie

jarhead

Posted
Posted

Do you people actually think that people think like that? Do you not think there are real concerns surrounding if he is worthy of the number 1 pick?

It would be a pretty easy pick if the criteria is based on his gift as an athelete and his arm strengh.A franchise QB has to be more than that.It is the intangibles that cloud the waters not race or anything else as far as I am concerned.

Can he be coached? Can he start making multiple reads versus relying on his running ability?Can he sit on the sidelines a year and soak it up like a sponge?Will he spend hours watching films and is able to accept construtive critisism?

If the answer is yes then I say bring him in as the first pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catalyst Newbie

Catalyst

Posted
Posted

I do have questions/concerns about Cam. I do admit there is a high level of risk involved with taking him. I just feel his potential is so high that it's worth the risk. And I also think we need to address QB badly enough that if there's someone there at QB with star potential - which I believe Cam has - then we have to use this pick on that player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
eViL jEsTeR Newbie

eViL jEsTeR

Posted
Posted

We're not selecting Cam with the #1 overall. It just isn't going to happen. This pick is far to valuable to take on such a risk. We will select Dareus, give Clausen a chance to comptete with a possible veteran we bring in in the new offensive scheme and look for a QB in a later round or address it with a future draft.

It is drama free, and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catalyst Newbie

Catalyst

Posted
Posted

We're not selecting Cam with the #1 overall. It just isn't going to happen. This pick is far to valuable to take on such a risk. We will select Dareus, give Clausen a chance to comptete with a possible veteran we bring in in the new offensive scheme and look for a QB in a later round or address it with a future draft.

It is drama free, and simple.

Is there some kind of deal that can be struck here to have all the anti-Cam posters film their reactions when the pick is announced and post them? I'd honestly pay good money to see that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Millions Newbie

Millions

Posted
Posted

Started with the whole huggers sh1t...Do you not think there are some people that like his skill set and star potential? that think QB is the most important position in football today that we have to address to keep up in our division. Are terrified to go into the season with Moore, Clausen and Pike again.

Every realistic number 1 draft prospect has question marks or would be considered reaching imo. Only ones that don't are Green and PP7 who are beast as I've stated but we just have bigger needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Rookie

teeray

Posted
Posted

They ant-Cam people are the Haters and thr pro-Cam guys are the Huggers.

I this his negatives are overblown and I don't think he is the major project people make him out to be. A lot of the one read and run stuff is from early in the season as he was becoming more comfortable with the offense. Remember TRD and others said whay he did at Blinn doesn't matter because, as on Hater put it, JUCO ix less than even high school football. If that is true you have a guy tnat is essentially a true freshman in terms of preparedness. As the season progressed and he was more comfortable in the offense he really mainly dominated from the pocket and often times went through 3-4 reads (well maybe 2-3).

So you have a guy that dominated the SEC in a way that no one has done in a while, as essentially a true freshman.

WOW!!! The more you Haters make me think about it the more I buy into him. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

They ant-Cam people are the Haters and thr pro-Cam guys are the Huggers.

I this his negatives are overblown and I don't think he is the major project people make him out to be. A lot of the one read and run stuff is from early in the season as he was becoming more comfortable with the offense. Remember TRD and others said whay he did at Blinn doesn't matter because, as on Hater put it, JUCO ix less than even high school football. If that is true you have a guy tnat is essentially a true freshman in terms of preparedness. As the season progressed and he was more comfortable in the offense he really mainly dominated from the pocket and often times went through 3-4 reads (well maybe 2-3).

So you have a guy that dominated the SEC in a way that no one has done in a while, as essentially a true freshman.

WOW!!! The more you Haters make me think about it the more I buy into him. :lol:

Please go watch the games before you say that the one read and run was an early season issue. It was the offense that he ran. He NEVER made multiple reads. Not necessarily because he can't...but because that was the offense he was asked to run.

My questions about this issue are there because there just isn't tape to see the guy doing it. I hope that the coaching staff (Rivera, Shula, etc) put Cam (and all QB's that we are looking at) through the ringer on this. Show him tape of certain situations and plays from the past years....and ask him to quickly (real time) make reads.

This, and only this, could come close to answering these types of questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Rookie

teeray

Posted
Posted

I have watched every game and since it has begun to look like we might take him I have watched most of them twice now. It is bullpoo. Not saying there wasn't some of that but on passing plays that were called he actually rarely ran. So his first read most have been open 90% of the time.

His running stats are mainly from designed runs. Not from him bailing on a pass play or not being patient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chef17 Apprentice

chef17

Posted
Posted

I have watched every game and since it has begun to look like we might take him I have watched most of them twice now. It is bullpoo. Not saying there wasn't some of that but on passing plays that were called he actually rarely ran. So his first read most have been open 90% of the time.

His running stats are mainly from designed runs. Not from him bailing on a pass play or not being patient.

About time you realized this :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...