Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Derek Landri and Barry Cofield


Recommended Posts

I wouldnt mind seeing the panthers make a move for cofield in free agency he is still young at 27. he and landri would be 2 good starters for us at the d tackle positions.then draft another tackle in the 3rd round or 2nd when we trade back into the 2nd. people think landri isnt that good, but he had comparable stats to cofield last season,and believe it or not, landri was top 10 in tackles for loss in the nfl for defensive tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Landri definately impressed. He'll continue to get better, esppecially if we can put a dominate tackle beside him.

:iagree:

Landri is one of those types of players that can take advantage of other teams focusing on a top rated DT. I would have loved to see what he would have done next to a healthy Jenkins or Kemo.

Not good enough to main DT but good enough to be highly productive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Landri was great at slipping through gaps vs. the run, but he struggled to provide pass rush. He is a solid roational player.

I saw that the Panthers were talking (2 mos. ago) to Purnell McPhee, a DE from Miss St. He is not an effective pass rusher at 285 lbs from the end position. I could not help but wonder if we might be considering him at the 3 technique, where he would be a good pass-rushing DT--maybe. He is tall and could add 10 pounds. Nice compliment to Landri, who we need to re-sign before anything else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...