Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Article about Auburn passing attack


MHS831

Recommended Posts

jury is still out on these JR QB's Sanchez, Stafford, and Bradford but they have been pretty successful so far in their respected careers.

Yes, you are right about that, but Clausen also fits into that category. However, if you look at the QBs below who came out early, only 14% (about 20% if you call Vick a success and I probably do), succeeded. That is why I am against picking Cam. The foundation is not there yet. We are all arguing physical set vs. mindset, which explains the divide. History is working against Newton, not the haters. They simply see the odds against him. Some say he cannot be compared to them because he is a stud--not enough of one to overcome The Golden Calf of Bristol, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article might have been, to some a negative on Newton's passing ability, but for me it gives me some resolve on his passing ability. If anything, from those videos and explanation, I feel much better about his passing ability. Still raw as hell, but encouraging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article might have been, to some a negative on Newton's passing ability, but for me it gives me some resolve on his passing ability. If anything, from those videos and explanation, I feel much better about his passing ability. Still raw as hell, but encouraging.

The part that describes the jump from his level of development at Auburn to where it would be as a senior to the NFL is sobering. It is like going from bonehead math to calculus in a year.

And we are going to draft him without the possibility of OTAs, training camp? Whew. How can anyone expect him to be successful before about 2013?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The part that describes the jump from his level of development at Auburn to where it would be as a senior to the NFL is sobering. It is like going from bonehead math to calculus in a year.

And we are going to draft him without the possibility of OTAs, training camp? Whew. How can anyone expect him to be successful before about 2013?

I guess what I was trying to say is, at least it appears that he has the physial ability. Hopefully he'll be one to study tape day and night to catch up to the mental aspect. Put an ability to progress and stick in the pocket with his physical ability is startling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess what I was trying to say is, at least it appears that he has the physial ability. Hopefully he'll be one to study tape day and night to catch up to the mental aspect. Put an ability to progress and stick in the pocket with his physical ability is startling.

He sure does. If you designed a robot QB to compete in the NFL, it would look like Newton. Just hope the software works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The part that describes the jump from his level of development at Auburn to where it would be as a senior to the NFL is sobering. It is like going from bonehead math to calculus in a year.

And we are going to draft him without the possibility of OTAs, training camp? Whew. How can anyone expect him to be successful before about 2013?

That will be true for most qbs in the draft if they cannot resolve the CBA.Bad year to be picking a qb and if they have an abbreviated training period it wll show

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't classify Vick as a failure... he took the Falcons to the NFC championship game and had a pretty darn good season for the Eagles last year.

I would take some Falcon-era Vick right about now. He's no Brady or Manning but they were always in games when he was under center and I think Cam will give us the same "x-factor" Vick gave the Falcons/Eagles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't classify Vick as a failure... he took the Falcons to the NFC championship game and had a pretty darn good season for the Eagles last year.

I would take some Falcon-era Vick right about now. He's no Brady or Manning but they were always in games when he was under center and I think Cam will gives us the same "x-factor".

He sure changed the way we drafted (Thomas Davis).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is also important to note that the article does not delve into the player as much as the coach and his scheme. If he were, he would have had to rely mostly on opinions based on tape/interviews with Cam which would have decreased the credibillity of the article. It does, however, leave room to wonder how closely the coach was able to stick to his pure style of offense and not have to adjust to his quarterback. I'm not saying he had to dumb down or make advances in his offense (which if I were to guess I would say he needed to do both in regards to run/pass due to the talent level and experience that Cam brought to the offense).

Bottom line and the conclusion of every Cam discussion I've read through is that Cam has the physique and the talent to be able to evolve into an NFL QB, but his capacity to learn and comprehend an NFL offense is still very much in question. His talent can compensate for a lot, but is he "that guy" that can take his play to the next level, or is he going to have to rely on his physical talent and have the same mental "cap" that M. Vick, V. Young, J. Russell, and others have? The drive and talent are obviously there (you can tell from his coaches rhetoric that drive isn't the problem i.e. J. Russell)... but what kind of QB is Cam Newton really going to be? Can he run the Chud/Rivera offense or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are still some question marks, some missing links. However, this supports Gabbert as well. These QBs are coming out early, so the importance of the additional year in college cannot be understated. Probably why Locker made his decision. I mean, we all look at him as a moron for staying in, but if he was the second QB taken in 2010, his salary would be millions higher for being the first QB taken in 2011. Bad gamble.

THis is closer to the info that the scouts would consider. However, the fact that 4 out of the last 9 QBs to be drafted first overall is still scary. Which QBs taken #1 overall since 1998 became consistent starters?

The biggest concern to me is the Jump the junior QBs have to make to become a successful NFL QB from being an underclassman. Check out this article on the Junior (or sophomore) QBs making the leap to the NFL in the past 20 years or so. Sobering:

http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/04/george-santayana-quotes-unsuccessful-history-drafting-junior-underclassmen-qbs-in-first-round-nfl-draft/

Here is the list:

Successes

•Ben Roethlisberger

•Drew Bledsoe

Failures

•Alex Smith

•Rex Grossman (yes, he made a Super Bowl, but does anyone really consider him anything other than a failure in Chicago?)

•Michael Vick (if maturity is what keeps underclassmen QBs from succeeding, then I think Vick has to be considered a failure despite his flashes of success.)

•Tim Couch

•Ryan Leaf

•Heath Shuler

•Tommy Maddox

•Todd Marinovich

•Jeff George

•Andre Ware

add: Jamarcus Russell, Vince Young

Borderline: Trent Dilfer (I say failure for the most part)

You forgot Claus...:leaving:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...