Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers and Tight End's (Should we draft a Tight End?)


Recommended Posts

Kendrick's is not small he is 6-4, 241 lbs. and overall probably one of if not the best tight end in the class just. The Panthers just don't need to use a pick on a tight end that early.

As far as Housler goes, if he can beef up and put on some weight he would be a big asset.

I was thinking Kendrick was similar size as Williams, I guess 6'4 241 isn't too small but the four I like (Rudolph, Thomas, Cameron, Stocker) are all bigger. Thomas and Cameron are more athletic and Rudolph is just a stud. My interest in Stocker is falling, but I still wouldn't be upset if we got him a little later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason I brought this particular topic up is because with no CBA in place (meaning we can't resign players) the Panthers may be forced into taking a tight end based on the indication that only two are on the roster.

Now as far as the guys I really like, I am essentially down to two guys. I would either like Lance Kendricks at the end of the third with our compensatory pick or take Collin Franklin with our compensatory pick in the 7th.

I am sold on Kendricks if the coaches believe that Barnidge is nothing better than a career backup. However, if the coaches believe Barnidge is starter material, than I like Franklin who will be a solid backup in the NFL in my opinion

My ideal depth chart for the tight end position next year.

Option 1

1. Jeremy Shockey

2. Lance Kendricks

3. Gary Barnidge

Option 2

1. Jeremy Shockey

2. Gary Barnidge

3. Collin Franklin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...