Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Taking the 15th ranked player with the #1 overall pick doesn't make much sense...

Darth Urious

By Darth Urious,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Darth Urious Newbie

Darth Urious

Posted
Posted

Let me preface this with the clearly stated opinion that I don't want to draft a QB at all... Andrew Luck probably wouldn't change that either, so I have no bias against any player... if anything it is a bias against drafting a QB...

That said... How can you justify taking Newton ahead of someone like Dareus, who is often ranked at least 8 or so players ahead of him in most scouts eyes?

I get that some people believe QB is a dire need... I get that some people want to roll the dice on Cam if for no other reason to bring some excitement to the field and hope that the risk translates into rewards...

But, in all seriousness, how do you justify such a roll of the dice when there are players figured to be better at their positions (some of which we could use more than a little help with) across the collective boards?

Most scouts have Dareus, Peterson, Green, and Miller all rated at the top of the draft, yet some people are so set on the Panthers and Newton being a match that I just don't get it completely...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Collaborator

teeray

Posted
Posted

If you spend hours, and hours, and hours, of meetings, tape, workouts, etc. on a QB, and you think he can be your guy after all that research and you determine that QB is your biggest need. And he happens to be ranked #15;

Well not only can you takes that guy at #1, you must take that guy #1. especially at the QB position.

If you study him and decide he can't be your guy then you pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bj-Monster23 Newbie

Bj-Monster23

Posted
Posted

Because we struggled at the quarterback position for a couple of years Well most of the years in Carolina. And you dont win games in this league unless you have a solid quarterback. A quarterback makes your team 65% better. It takes alot of pressure off the whole team especially the defense. Sometimes people do make mistakes evaluating players, we know that Cam and blaine are pretty good quarterbacks but we just dont know who will bust or who will be good its just a chance you gotta take. But I know some people on this board who feel that the guy is not smart enough he is not accuarte enough and he has to many character problems. Sometimes people act like they havent made mistakes in there life. I dont think there is anybody on this board that is perfect or is it. If the guy is willing to come in and work on his game and be a film rat and a gym rat he is worth the money and the pick. The key thing is, is he willing to be a man and listen to the coaches. Thats all you can ask for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sword Newbie

Sword

Posted
Posted

even mel kiper has said if he didn't have the past issues, he'd be the best player on the board..so if the panthers have gotten passed all the past issues(and there have reports that said they have)..their big board will look a lot different then you think.

Josh Freeman was at the top of the bucs board and they would have drafted him with the 1st pick if they had it that year.

Sam Bradford was also ranked around 11-15 last year and Suh was the consensus best player you could get...so really where a player is ranked isn't gonna change my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Happy Panther Grand Master

Happy Panther

Posted
Posted

Let me preface this with the clearly stated opinion that I don't want to draft a QB at all... Andrew Luck probably wouldn't change that either, so I have no bias against any player... if anything it is a bias against drafting a QB...

That said... How can you justify taking Newton ahead of someone like Dareus, who is often ranked at least 8 or so players ahead of him in most scouts eyes?

I get that some people believe QB is a dire need... I get that some people want to roll the dice on Cam if for no other reason to bring some excitement to the field and hope that the risk translates into rewards...

But, in all seriousness, how do you justify such a roll of the dice when there are players figured to be better at their positions (some of which we could use more than a little help with) across the collective boards?

Most scouts have Dareus, Peterson, Green, and Miller all rated at the top of the draft, yet some people are so set on the Panthers and Newton being a match that I just don't get it completely...

So Start clausen again all year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darth Urious Newbie

Darth Urious

Posted
  • Author
Posted

And another question... Do you believe QB is the most important position on a team?? If so that could answer your question on why QB's get drafted before players ranked higher than them.... Because they have a bigger impact on long term team success IMO.

First question you asked first:

I don't think the current QB situation is as dire as most Chicken Little's here think... especially if we bring MM back... I'd love to pick up a post-CBA FA, sure... but he doesn't have to be a day one starter... just like Cam or any other rookie wouldn't be...

Now to the above post...

No, QB is not the most important position... as evidenced by the Panthers squad that made the Super Bowl... Football is a team sport, and Stephen Davis, Steve Smith, Muhsin Muhammad, and a stingy defense had way more to do with that run than Jake Delhomme did... The stuff that Jake did have going for him that year was that he was an unknown, and there wasn't much to look at on tape of him that anyone cared about...

QBs do get taken earlier sometimes, but do I really need to rattle off the failed calls, specifically at that position, over the years? Teams that fail at drafting the correct player and taking a QB that doesn't pan out end up hurting their franchise more than helping it... IMO

Again, I have no real malice for Cam, Gabbert, or any QB in this draft, other than the fact that they are QBs...

If we go that route, cool beans... I'll especially be glad if it works out and whoever it is succeeds on the field...

But if we do, and he doesn't... don't be mad when I say I told you we could have had someone better...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darth Urious Newbie

Darth Urious

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Is it a consensus he's ranked 15th?

For all you know hurney could personally have him ranked top 5

Possibly... but he could also have him ranked 25...

That argument is invalid, and based on personal speculation...

I'm talking about scouting services and other people that get paid to watch film/rank players...

Also let me note that just because he isn't ranked #1 doesn't mean he isn't their top QB... They just have other players at different positions ranked higher...

QB isn't my top Panthers need, so it doesn't make much sense to pass on a DT that is...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted

Possibly... but he could also have him ranked 25...

That argument is invalid, and based on personal speculation...

I'm talking about scouting services and other people that get paid to watch film/rank players...

Also let me note that just because he isn't ranked #1 doesn't mean he isn't their top QB... They just have other players at different positions ranked higher...

QB isn't my top Panthers need, so it doesn't make much sense to pass on a DT that is...

Only what the coaches think matters. What anyone else thinks means sh**.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

    • strato
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By strato · Posted

      Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...