Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you buy a timeshare?


charlottenian

Recommended Posts

They are practically being given away now, I can pretty much get one for $50 and be responsible for the yearly maintenance fee, I am interested in one like this:

http://cgi.ebay.com/SHERATON-VISTANA-CASCADES-ORLANDO-FLORIDA-TIMESHARE-/140536861218?pt=Timeshares&hash=item20b8a65222

where you get a floating week, lockoff (allows for a configuration of two individual weeks at 1 bedroom rather than a week as a two bedroom).

Thoughts or experiences are appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

like the idea of timeshare as you get the flexibility to trade and go to more than just one place

like the idea of just buying something because then it's yours!

so, in my opinion, it really matters what you want to do and how long you want to be doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my inlaws and my wifes first (late) husbands parents have these. I've never heard them complain about the finances involved, but we both really like when they invite us to go to the beach for a week - this year it's the inlaws at Edisto. Last year they went to Williamsburg, Myrtle before that. The other grandparents have had us to Orlando and took the kids to Myrtle for our honeymoon. You do need to reserve where you want to go pretty far in advance from what I've seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Positives/negatives with timeshares/owning.

Our schedule shifts so much that we like to maintain flexibility and liquidity. A timeshare isn't an investment. It's a lease versus buying a new car. I do neither. I wait and see a good deal that meets my schedule and price range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would look into just owning property somewhere like that... You can get a deal on that right now too, and you make the rules/schedule then...

Why timeshare now when you could outright purchase something dirt cheap, since as an investment property you have nothing to sell of your own holding things up?

Isn't hurricane insurance outrageous?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are practically being given away now, I can pretty much get one for $50 and be responsible for the yearly maintenance fee, I am interested in one like this:

http://cgi.ebay.com/SHERATON-VISTANA-CASCADES-ORLANDO-FLORIDA-TIMESHARE-/140536861218?pt=Timeshares&hash=item20b8a65222

where you get a floating week, lockoff (allows for a configuration of two individual weeks at 1 bedroom rather than a week as a two bedroom).

Thoughts or experiences are appreciated.

If I ever invested in property I better damn well own the whole thing.

Positives/negatives with timeshares/owning.

Our schedule shifts so much that we like to maintain flexibility and liquidity. A timeshare isn't an investment. It's a lease versus buying a new car. I do neither. I wait and see a good deal that meets my schedule and price range.

this..

a few things to keep in mind when buying a timeshare and why they are going for cheap...

-A timeshare holds no equity, so you own nothing. a timeshare company has no need to take back timeshare deeds when they can simply draw up another contract with a new client. your deed holds no monetary value at all.

-It is a contract that can never be broken. when you pass away, it WILL go to your children and they have leverage to sue if maintenance fees are not paid.

-timeshares can be rented online and available in the same way you can find a cheap hotel from expedia, etc.

the TS industry is a scam. you shouldn't call it an investment, because one thing it is not is an investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spending 5-15k (or more) on a timeshare is one of the worst possible decisions someone can make.

I agree...it's stupid. I was in Myrtle a couple of weeks ago and they actually don't call it 'Time Share' anymore....i'ts 'Vacation Ownership.' :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...