Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All this Cam vs. Clausen talk

TruCatzFan

By TruCatzFan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
Posted

Is completely overblown in my opinion! I've been hearing about it and reading about it on every sports network since the draft. Just this am Mike and Mike were debating whether Clausen should give Cam the #... Last night on ESPN Keyshawn Johnson and Steve Young argued about whether or not Clausen should give the # to Cam in the new Audibles show!

Basically, I think that they're already overblowing this whole thing and I don't even think it's that big of an issue! I'm just tired of the mainstream media taking something small about our team and overblowing it into something that it's not!

Am I alone in thinking like this? Weigh in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

Blaine already said he was going to wear number 11 in Jacksonville. They dont expect Sims-Walker back. They gave him the jersey and everything.
bring him here.

i'm just glad that we've got a QB that players will be excited about playing with and a coach that people really respect. should see the level of FA talent brought in rise significantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
Posted

On WFNZ this morning, Hurney said Clausen wanted # 7 last year but Baker wouldn't give it up, so now it's a 3-way thing this year because Clausen wants # 7 in order to give up # 2.

IMO, Baker is a friggin punter - take his number and reassign it to Clausen so Cam can have # 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

On WFNZ this morning, Hurney said Clausen wanted # 7 last year but Baker wouldn't give it up, so now it's a 3-way thing this year because Clausen wants # 7 in order to give up # 2.

IMO, Baker is a friggin punter - take his number and reassign it to Clausen so Cam can have # 2.

easy fix, Cam won't have Clausen money coming in.....Cam pays Baker and everyone walks away happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ashor Newbie

Ashor

Posted
Posted

It's the pecking order. If Clausen couldn't get his number than I don't think Newton should. Keyshawn and Dilfer were right, Clausen needs to be assertive and tell him that it's his number and nobody can take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

It's the pecking order. If Clausen couldn't get his number than I don't think Newton should. Keyshawn and Dilfer were right, Clausen needs to be assertive and tell him that it's his number and nobody can take it.

too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Also, it's not like Cam made that T-shirt himself! It was made for him by the team... I'm just sayin guys... This feud that media is creating is ALREADY old!! It's between them, Clausen has already said and I quote " It's mine for now, we'll see what happens"

I could care less if Cam and Jimmy wear 98 and 99... As long as they compete with one another making them both better QB's!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...