Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bynum's vs LBJ's Apology


HeatCheck

Recommended Posts

Both apologies seem to be a bit late, with LBJ's coming about 10 months late.

Bynum apologized after they were eliminated while LBJ's came in a series win. I think apologizing after beating his nemesis is a whole lot easier to do.

I do think it takes a lot for both of them to come out and apologize and it shows a lot of maturity. But if I had to choose which one I thought was more sincere, I would say Andrew Bynum's was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For some reason Id rather take LBJ's apology, I know how late it is, but I do feel some sincerity in there.

Had Bynum not gave that shitty interview after the game showing zero remorse for what he did, and then days later issuing an apology, to me is bullshit. I don't buy it, but I don't need to buy it. Still think 5 games isn't enough, but it is what it is. I still think hes a piece of poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well he obviously felt like he had to apologize. And I am sure there were people advising him to do so. He realized how he left Cleveland wasn't the best way to do it. I don't think many people would argue that.

I just think the timing of it was a little off and very convenient to do when he had just won one his biggest series of his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be the first one to say I hated the way LeBron went about the whole thing, I thought it was a horrible way to treat his fans and the city. HOWEVER...

You can't even compare these two events.

One was a man, deciding what HE thought was the best route in his career. Hate it or love it, it's his life, and no one was really hurt.

Bynum however, is a thug. He's done this numerous times before to players, and is a outright just dirty player. He even did the typical "thug" action with the shirt removal and all of that crap. So no, I don't believe his apology, but time will tell if he acts like a jerk again. Five games, even though it's 700k, is not enough. I seriously think that when a player does something like this, the first time, it should be a year, again, permanent. People that use a performance enhancer get more suspension in sports it seems, while that IS cheating, it's different than some 7 foot guy taking someone down.

Two different situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not condoning what Bynum did but the Mavs weren't winning with the most class and basketball believe it or not is a physical game sometimes. Anyone saying Bynum should be suspended for a year for this is either....

A. A Laker hater

or

B. Asinine....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not condoning what Bynum did but the Mavs weren't winning with the most class and basketball believe it or not is a physical game sometimes. Anyone saying Bynum should be suspended for a year for this is either....

A. A Laker hater

or

B. Asinine....

First, no one is a 'Laker Hater' secondly, that was an intentional hit out of frustration just because the little b*tch wasn't winning? He wouldn't dare hit Lebron or someone his own size like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...