Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are goatees really that repulsive?


Jase

Recommended Posts

I think the one thing a beard or goatee have going for them is that 99% of dudes with beards or goatees don't f*ck around. We normally mean business and get sh*t done. Whether you need a house built or you are trying to sell ice to an eskimo, call a guy with facial hair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Random facial hair makes me people lie. I grew out a beard back in the winter and a gal I work with said, "Oh, you look great in a beard! It really looks good on you." Well, it was only a winter beard, so I shaved come spring. Same girl, "Oh, you look great! You look so nice shaved!"

So...

Yes, I'm a handsome devil. That's understood. That said, most people are going to tell you it looks great... but, in reality... well, you decide. It's your fuggen chin/face. Fug em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing says you're a fan of Larry the Cable Guy like a goatee. Grow the whole beard or keep your face smooth. And if you grow a beard, trim it up. Even BruceBrewski's picture shows shaved neck hair.

I was growing a goatee before I even knew who Larry was....

And I think you are looking too close at Bruce's' face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...