Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dirty Bag Smith stil running the Union


Recommended Posts

You can say they decertified the union all you want. But when the one person that put you in this place as your UNION leader is still leading the charge. Then he still is in Charge of the UNION, whether you call it a Union, a association or a Fuging Club.

The "Union" didn't bargain in good faith and decertify to get the upper hand. Any judge in his/her right mind can see that the Decertification was a sham and that D. Smith is still running the show.

On June 3rd or hopefully soon after the owners will have their lockout and the courts will say the Decertification is a SHAM... Which it is.

Because if it looks like poo and smells like poo that it probably is poo.

http://eye-on-football.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/22475988/29466293

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to agree with you. I don't think players did things the appropriate way, and I believe Demaurice Smith's sole intention was to get this thing into the court system.

I don't really care about either side. Let's face it. At this point, we're talking about a bunch of multi-millionaire cry babies. However, the longer this thing drags out, the more I tend to side with the owners. The players association or trade association or whatever the heck it is nowadays has shown that it doesn't care about the game, which may not be how a majority of the players feel.

I think we are now looking at a true case of the cart driving the horse with Demaurice Smith holding the reins. Even with the 8th Circuit's ruling last week, the union continues to exaggerate and overblow things. All you have to do is look at the latest court filing by the players. The NFLPA* is the only side using a derogatory attitude, and I have yet to hear about them countering any of the owners' proposals or offering one of their own.

At this point, I really hope the courts hand it to the players. Do I want the players putting their bodies on the line without due compensation? No. Do I want them disabled for life with no healthcare? Depends. Many people in today's world are in that boat, and they didn't have the chance to makes millions in a single year. Do I care about the owners' land lease deals or stadium expenses? No. Not at all.

Just get the thing done already. I believe 3 June will truly set the stage for the collapse of the union's "bargaining" position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to agree with you. I don't think players did things the appropriate way, and I believe Demaurice Smith's sole intention was to get this thing into the court system.

I don't really care about either side. Let's face it. At this point, we're talking about a bunch of multi-millionaire cry babies. However, the longer this thing drags out, the more I tend to side with the owners. The players association or trade association or whatever the heck it is nowadays has shown that it doesn't care about the game, which may not be how a majority of the players feel.

I think we are now looking at a true case of the cart driving the horse with Demaurice Smith holding the reins. Even with the 8th Circuit's ruling last week, the union continues to exaggerate and overblow things. All you have to do is look at the latest court filing by the players. The NFLPA* is the only side using a derogatory attitude, and I have yet to hear about them countering any of the owners' proposals or offering one of their own.

At this point, I really hope the courts hand it to the players. Do I want the players putting their bodies on the line without due compensation? No. Do I want them disabled for life with no healthcare? Depends. Many people in today's world are in that boat, and they didn't have the chance to makes millions in a single year. Do I care about the owners' land lease deals or stadium expenses? No. Not at all.

Just get the thing done already. I believe 3 June will truly set the stage for the collapse of the union's "bargaining" position.

I hope so. I don't think Smith has the best interest of the NFLPA at heart. I think it is like you said. Get it in the courts and see how much they can squeeze out of the owner.

What gets me is because the owners agreed to give them XX% of the revenues doesn't mean they HAVE to this time. I don't know of any business that is required to give the employees a percentage of their income.

They could set a wage scale based on position and depth and seniority.

They could have no minimum and well as no cap.

They could ruin football all together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that they are still acting as a union, but I also think it is ironic that a corporation is asking a conservative court to force a group of employees into a union. I am actually hoping the owners will win not because I think they are right, but because I think it is what is best for the league. Also, I was shocked that highlandfire wasn't the creator of this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know that the players and the owners were conspiring to bring the NFL to an end since the Rapture was scheduled for yesterday. Why would you bother "negotiating" when you'd be Raptured away before the ink was dry. If I had a few Billion to throw around, I wouldn't waste my last days bickering about a few hundred mill. I'd be where Charlie Sheen is, doing blow off of a hookers rack.

But alas, the soothsayer Harold Camping (personal advisor to Al Davis) was wrong and Smith and the Cartel will have to cut a deal since the world won't be ending now until at least 2112 (GO AZTECS!!).

Looks like El Diablo has saved the 2011 NFL season, so a heartfelt thanks to the dark lord for staving off the end of times for one more year.

After living through the past 3 Raptures, I'm taking a vacation before The Real Deal makes the end of times prediction I can take to the bank..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can say they decertified the union all you want. But when the one person that put you in this place as your UNION leader is still leading the charge. Then he still is in Charge of the UNION, whether you call it a Union, a association or a Fuging Club.

The "Union" didn't bargain in good faith and decertify to get the upper hand. Any judge in his/her right mind can see that the Decertification was a sham and that D. Smith is still running the show.

On June 3rd or hopefully soon after the owners will have their lockout and the courts will say the Decertification is a SHAM... Which it is.

Because if it looks like poo and smells like poo that it probably is poo.

http://eye-on-football.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/22475988/29466293

The Appeals courts won't put up with this bull poo and they showed it with the continued lockout. If the players want a full season they need to get their asses back to the table NOW and not wait on the owners or courts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Article yesterday:

He recently delivered a commencement address to graduating University of Maryland students who may or may not care anything about the NFL or the current lockout. He turned his address into a political speech concerning the recent legal issues between NFL players and NFL owners.

Smith and others like him have inspired the players to adopt a self-righteous tone. They are telling everyone who will listen that NFL players are oppressed workers who need to feed their families and pay the medical bills.

Here's the thing: The minimum salary for rookies, players who had never played a down of professional football, in 2009 was $310,000. The median annual HOUSEHOLD income in the United States is around $50,000.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/712855-demaurice-smith-is-the-top-reason-to-side-against-the-nfl-players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...