Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Update


NJPanthers12

Recommended Posts

Responses I was expecting when you know I'm right.

dude, you contradict yourself at every turn. you trip over your own feet on every discussion. I didn't realize you were just graduating high school, so I'm trying to take it easy.

stop. just stop. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I read the initial post and skipped everything else, but sounds like we're still trying to be cheap.

More or less, just depending on the player. From the OP, it looks like the Panthers will do almost anything to get Coefield. They may go after a big CB like Joseph, Wright, or Taylor; or maybe they just grab a guy that they think can fit in and do a decent job. As far as the wide out position, it sounds like they will either go for Braylon Edwards or stick with what they got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who remembers the big FA additions the offseason before the superbowl run?

Stephen davis.

That is bargain shopping people. Finding talent that fits the team, makes an impact, and doesn't break the bank.

Don't spend money just to spend money.

Find the player that fits the role needed, and make a move for him.

Most fans can't even grasp that concept.

who said anything about spending money just to spend it? of course you find the right fit, otherwise it's a waste of money.

the issue i have is that you can't say you are going to go bargain shopping and then say you are going to find the right fit. as soon as you say you are bargain shopping, that immediately limits your ability to improve the team and find the true "right fit". it's the right fit with an asterisk.

i could understand speaking this way when you are talking to the press or to agents because you don't want to tip your hand, but this isn't the case. this is some leaky faucet within the organization talking to a friend over lunch.

am i suggesting that they go out and just throw money at every shiny big name? nope. what i am saying is that they should go out and get top talent at each of the four major holes (DT, CB, RG, WR). not the top talent, but a top talent. you get one that fits what you are trying to do here, understanding that you may have to open the pocket book wide to get it.

i don't question the team's commitment to getting better, but i do question their commitment to pinching pennies unnecessarily. they put themselves in a great financial position, but for what reason? so they could keep cheap or so they can improve the team? that's what i'm having a bit of trouble with.

am i thinking too much about this? of course, but it's a message board, that's what happens.

i just want the team to do what it takes to get better. they've gotten off to a good start. i don't want them to handcuff themselves when they don't have to by "bargain shopping."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now that you are out of school, does that mean you are going to be on here more?

please god no

one of my Steeler friends once told me last year that she'd rather have The Golden Calf of Bristol over Rothlisberger because he's a better QB.

if we don't educate the youngin's, who will?

then we have a bunch of THOSE fans...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...