Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dubstep...hmm


davos

Recommended Posts

I've really tried to find some artist in this style that I actually like for at least a year now and just can't. Countless peeps keep telling me how awesome it is throwing out names like Skrillex (sp?) and people play it all the damn time now, it never ends. I've really tried to like it, but I think its bad enough to the point where I'm wondering why people consider this engaging at any level on drugs, drunk, in a club, or whatever.

side story:

Now a bud who's been a "DJ" for a few years and doing pretty well at it wants me to help him on a new song. So I go over to do so...him and 2 friends are using that protools thing to produce. First few things I ask when I get there: What key is it in? What's the time signature? Wanna jam before we lay something down? Answers: They had no idea about any aspect of music theory, none at all and couldn't actually play an instrument.

There were 5 midi keyboards, 2 guitars, a bass, and a few mics...none being used while these guys and a gal argued after we blazed about the first 30 seconds of the song for at least an hour. The worst high experience of my life :( Painful to bear.

So back to dubstep:

So, someone please tell me what type of structure beyond incredibly overbearing bass to where you can't hear the accompaniment & layers that makes this music any different than house. What makes this a style that can only be formulated by musicians if everything is basically a samples of samples mashed together digitally on an interface that does everything for you? And feel free to post what you would consider fun/entertaining/good (whatever the hell adjective you wanna use) dubstep to convince me otherwise.

go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've really tried to find some artist in this style that I actually like for at least a year now and just can't. Countless peeps keep telling me how awesome it is throwing out names like Skrillex (sp?) and people play it all the damn time now, it never ends. I've really tried to like it, but I think its bad enough to the point where I'm wondering why people consider this engaging at any level on drugs, drunk, in a club, or whatever.

side story:

Now a bud who's been a "DJ" for a few years and doing pretty well at it wants me to help him on a new song. So I go over to do so...him and 2 friends are using that protools thing to produce. First few things I ask when I get there: What key is it in? What's the time signature? Wanna jam before we lay something down? Answers: They had no idea about any aspect of music theory, none at all and couldn't actually play an instrument.

There were 5 midi keyboards, 2 guitars, a bass, and a few mics...none being used while these guys and a gal argued after we blazed about the first 30 seconds of the song for at least an hour. The worst high experience of my life :( Painful to bear.

So back to dubstep:

So, someone please tell me what type of structure beyond incredibly overbearing bass to where you can't hear the accompaniment & layers that makes this music any different than house. What makes this a style that can only be formulated by musicians if everything is basically a samples of samples mashed together digitally on an interface that does everything for you? And feel free to post what you would consider fun/entertaining/good (whatever the hell adjective you wanna use) dubstep to convince me otherwise.

go

I don't know poo about dubstep, never heard of it.. but about your side story, I don't know your experience with people, but get used to the millions of people who fail to see the big picture and want to argue over 30 seconds of poo for over an hour.

I swear it's a disorder everyone has. I can't tell you how many good ideas I've talked to someone about and they're all hype about it only to get distracted over irrelevance, whether it's due to ego, knowitallism, OCD, or just being incredibly short-sighted and ignorant...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...