Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would You Kill For Your Child?


The Saltman

Recommended Posts

but to a degree that is comical......you could of killed someone's child and then that person's father murdering you would be more justified. He would be killing someone who did his child harm......you basically to some degree made a deal with the devil killing an innocent person for a magic cure.

Comical until you have a child and understand love so strong you do what it takes to protect them.

Justification be damned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comical until you have a child and understand love so strong you do what it takes to protect them.

Justification be damned.

I do have a child but I think in this scenario you are trying to blur the definition of what "protect" them means.

Basically, in Saltman's scenario the Devil himself could approach you and say your child is gonna die of a natural cause on Friday....if you set a preschool on fire killing everyone your child will live. You are trying to blur that as the samething as shooting someone trying to molest your kid or something.

If look at all possible scenarios that could be included in Salts question.....I still think people are answering yes too quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would 100% without a doubt kill or be killed to save my kid's life!

I would more than likely kill to save the life of someone near and dear to me as well.

answer me this....at what point do you draw the line on when you wouldn't kill? I mean would you blow up an entire country if it meant your child would live....and again, the country and people of it have made no threat to your child they are just random people.

that is what I don't get....at what point would the answer be no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

answer me this....at what point do you draw the line on when you wouldn't kill? I mean would you blow up an entire country if it meant your child would live....and again, the country and people of it have made no threat to your child they are just random people.

that is what I don't get....at what point would the answer be no?

nm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...