Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Women Density Observation


Panthro

Recommended Posts

Breast Density is one of the strongest predictors of the failure of mammography screening to detect cancer.

Women with extremely dense breast tissue have a 4 to 5 times greater cancer risk than women with fatty tissue.

Extremely dense breast tissue is a higher risk factor than having one first degree relative with breast cancer.

Adding an additional screening tool, such as MRI or Ultrasound, to the mammogram increases detection of SMALL, EARLY stage breast cancer.

Only one in 10 women learn about their dense breast tissue from their physician.

wtf are u tryin to say Panthro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that he means:

In Wilmington there is a very large number of young hot womenz, and not too many young single males.

It's seems much easier to get a hot girl in ILM to speak to you at a bar, and be interested than in a place like Charlotte or Raleigh.

I attribute the low number of single young males in this area to there not being nearly the job market that you find in other parts of the state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that he means:

In Wilmington there is a very large number of young hot womenz, and not too many young single males.

It's seems much easier to get a hot girl in ILM to speak to you at a bar, and be interested than in a place like Charlotte or Raleigh.

I attribute the low number of single young males in this area to there not being nearly the job market that you find in other parts of the state.

also easier to talk to a girl because the douche factor in Wilm is wayyyyyyyyy lower than it is in Charlotte or Raleigh.

When I go out in downtown Charlotte, I feel like I should be up North.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then places with fewer women (or more men (Kling Klong)) creates more suitors and thus no matter their looks they are as good as it gets for that locale.

I would also like to add Tampa and Charleston to the list of places where this occurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also easier to talk to a girl because the douche factor in Wilm is wayyyyyyyyy lower than it is in Charlotte or Raleigh.

When I go out in downtown Charlotte, I feel like I should be up North.

We still have our fair share, but they do seem to be picked on a little more quickly here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We still have our fair share, but they do seem to be picked on a little more quickly here.

I wish that would happen here!!!

So yeah, my immediate reaction downtown is to be a complete bitch. No, I don't want to talk to you now gtfout of here with your Ed Hardy shirt.

douchebaggery......its rampant in Charlotte, I tell ya.

129009012925361970.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also easier to talk to a girl because the douche factor in Wilm is wayyyyyyyyy lower than it is in Charlotte or Raleigh.

When I go out in downtown Charlotte, I feel like I should be up North.

I would have to disagree that talking to a girl in Charlotte is hard because of the douche factor. For every douche guy that is uptown on a weekend night (and there are many), there are 2 slutty women that can't get enough of that guy. Charlotte may be the easiest place on the East coast for Joey Bag-o-Donuts Gotti to talk to and hook up a with a girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...