Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

UDFA WishList


Kurb

Recommended Posts

http://www.mockingthedraft.com/tags/2011-udfa

http://thefootballexpert.com/mock-drafts/2011/bures2011mockdraft_7.html

http://www.nflroughdraft.com/node/119

http://www.nepatriotsdraft.com/2011-top-udfas

Best one so far....

A nice listing can be found ^

Top of my list ?

DB

Kendrick Burney CB UnC

Deunta Williams S UNC

OL

Kristofer O'Dowd | 6'5, 300 pounds | C | Southern California

Derek Hall | 6'5, 300 pounds | OT | Stanford

Willie Smith

TE

Zack Pianalto | 6'3, 250 pounds | North Carolina

Weslye Saunders | 6'5, 272 pounds | South Carolina

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i never paid attention to Burney in college, but he looked very useful in the senior bowl.

i also think there are a few tight ends that weren't drafted that could stick on a roster.

i remember a report that intimated that the Panthers would be bringing in a lot of bodies for both lines from the UDFA pool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen.

GTFO with college affiliations.

Burney and Williams can both ball. Pinalto is great when he is healthy.

These people can be gems.

Once you are in the NFL I dont give a fug where you went to college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burney ran a 4.7 40

There is a reason no one took him.

Burney can play. Who gives a crap about his 40? His ball skills can be matched with any corner that went drafted. He's not scared to tackle. He's quick. He's a great ST player.

Not that I nut hug foxsports, but they have him as their number one UDFA.

When we pass on him and someone else reaps the benefits, you can take that 4.7 and shove it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen.

GTFO with college affiliations.

Burney and Williams can both ball. Pinalto is great when he is healthy.

These people can be gems.

Once you are in the NFL I dont give a fug where you went to college.

Sorry but you sound like a unc fan! No more heels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dang, we might not be able to create the same magic from last year!
    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2023 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 NCAA season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
×
×
  • Create New...