Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettis & LaFell: Keys to Success

davos

By davos,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

With all the recent talk about the receivers we could bring in, let's discuss who we currently know will be playing a lot this season: Gettis & LaFell

We saw minor dosages of awesome in Gettis especially last year and also the rookie speedbumps. Now I've personally learned to be cautious with receivers that seem like there gonna be something after their rookie season. You know the names...but I have to get it out about these two wideouts:

Now I'm personally looking at David Gettis as a potential star in the making.

David's already shown he hasn't lost a beat in TC so far and looking back at some dvr from last year, he honestly showed more than Colbert or Carter ever did. I'm putting a lot of faith in him, but I think with the supporting cast in Olsen, Smith, Shockey, the O-line, & Triple Trouble, Gettis and of course Newton are the most vital assets to major offensive success and fast. If these two can develop strong chemistry on the field, it could be the key that unlocks a lethal offense. Gettis is fast, tall, and has above average strength for a receiver. He is built and has the athleticism to be a top receiver in this league...same with Newton at QB.

27f5H.St.138.jpg

I'm honestly thinking he could be our #1 by the beginning of next season. Them developing a chemistry is essential imo.

Then you have LaFell who I think will prove to grow more consistent down the road, but his process may take a little longer. He may have more growing pains than Gettis, but he no doubt could be a great compliment.

Now putting all of this crazy optimism aside, can it happen? What is a realistic time frame in your mind that this can come into fruition? I believe if we don't sign a FA wideout, Rivera, Hurney, & Chud are telling us that it will happen at a greater rate than we think.

Let's discuss these two and their true potential...what say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Razeyfingers Newbie

Razeyfingers

Posted
Posted

LaFell to me looks like much more of a sure thing than Gettis. Ill change my opinion when I see Blankman starts catching the ball with his hands. He's doing very well but he's not at LaFell's level of skill. Lots of potential there and more speed, but LaFell would be better suited to at least claim that he could be a #1 next year.

What horrid music in that highlight video

just aweful

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CLG Experienced

CLG

Posted
Posted

Lafell is gonna surprise those blinded by their love of Gettis. I like them both, but i've noticed that quite a few people underestimate Lafells ability. Nonetheless, this team has a bright future!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Razey: LaFell going that higher than Gettis in the draft says something and I see where you're coming from...but I really think Gettis has shown some major play maker skills in him. LaFell reminds me a lot like Moose who worked great as a number 1 at times but also could step into a lesser role to spread the field and let guys like Smitty blow up. Moose & Brandon are even similar physically being 6-2 ~215

Gettis' combination of size, speed, and strength compliment LaFell's abilities and would prove to make more big plays imo. Even though he's only an inch taller, they play differently and their strengths could pair into a lethal combo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Razeyfingers Newbie

Razeyfingers

Posted
Posted

Razey: LaFell going that higher than Gettis in the draft says something and I see where you're coming from...but I really think Gettis has shown some major play maker skills in him. LaFell reminds me a lot like Moose who worked great as a number 1 at times but also could step into a lesser role to spread the field and let guys like Smitty blow up. Moose & Brandon are even similar physically being 6-2 ~215

Gettis' combination of size, speed, and strength compliment LaFell's abilities and would prove to make more big plays imo. Even though he's only an inch taller, they play differently and their strengths could pair into a lethal combo

Put Gettis on that jugs machine and let me see balls sticking to his hands then tho mang. Love the Blankman, Beach, but he has to learn how to catch with his hands and there may be an adjustment period where he begins to try to do that with poor results (I hope not). Right now LaFell is more agile and has better hands, plus he knows the spot a lil better to the point where he can play 1 2 or 3 (in the slot).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Looking Way Ahead, But.

      By TD alt · Posted

      That's likely going to tell the story. He'll have two weeks to prepare, so no excuses.
    • PantherChris
      Injuries

      By PantherChris · Posted

      You don't rotate offensive linemen dude shown me one time thats happened for us that wasnt because of a player leaving due to injury or a jumbo package ill wait.
    • tukafan21
      Looking Way Ahead, But.

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I didn't say I thought throwing it was a bad decision, I said I thought not running those 3-5 yard routes to pick up the 1st down wasn't a great call.  Yes the play worked out, but I didn't love the play call, it's like when a bad shooter is taking a 3 and you're yelling "no no no" as they're going up and then they make it so it worked out. That's still gambling on them to make the play and I take no issue with that. But I just went and watched the play again, we had T-Mac and XL running downfield crossing routes, Coker went in motion behind the LOS and then moved up a yard or two after the snap but not even past the LOS, Sanders chipped the DE and then ran a drag route right long the LOS. The play worked out, but I don't really like that particular play call and route tree with the game on the line on a 4th and 2.  If you want to send one route downfield as an option that's fine, but there were only 2 realistic target options with that route tree and they were both 15-20 yards downfield. This is just before Bryce is going to throw it.   You have 2 players off screen downfield, one player who ran a route that never had a chance to get open and didn't even get to the 1st down line, another player just at the line to gain but late in the route because of a chip (and the worst pass catcher of the 4). Do you really think that was a "good play call" in that situation? 
×
×
  • Create New...