Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettis & LaFell: Keys to Success


davos

Recommended Posts

With all the recent talk about the receivers we could bring in, let's discuss who we currently know will be playing a lot this season: Gettis & LaFell

We saw minor dosages of awesome in Gettis especially last year and also the rookie speedbumps. Now I've personally learned to be cautious with receivers that seem like there gonna be something after their rookie season. You know the names...but I have to get it out about these two wideouts:

Now I'm personally looking at David Gettis as a potential star in the making.

David's already shown he hasn't lost a beat in TC so far and looking back at some dvr from last year, he honestly showed more than Colbert or Carter ever did. I'm putting a lot of faith in him, but I think with the supporting cast in Olsen, Smith, Shockey, the O-line, & Triple Trouble, Gettis and of course Newton are the most vital assets to major offensive success and fast. If these two can develop strong chemistry on the field, it could be the key that unlocks a lethal offense. Gettis is fast, tall, and has above average strength for a receiver. He is built and has the athleticism to be a top receiver in this league...same with Newton at QB.

27f5H.St.138.jpg

I'm honestly thinking he could be our #1 by the beginning of next season. Them developing a chemistry is essential imo.

Then you have LaFell who I think will prove to grow more consistent down the road, but his process may take a little longer. He may have more growing pains than Gettis, but he no doubt could be a great compliment.

Now putting all of this crazy optimism aside, can it happen? What is a realistic time frame in your mind that this can come into fruition? I believe if we don't sign a FA wideout, Rivera, Hurney, & Chud are telling us that it will happen at a greater rate than we think.

Let's discuss these two and their true potential...what say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LaFell to me looks like much more of a sure thing than Gettis. Ill change my opinion when I see Blankman starts catching the ball with his hands. He's doing very well but he's not at LaFell's level of skill. Lots of potential there and more speed, but LaFell would be better suited to at least claim that he could be a #1 next year.

What horrid music in that highlight video

just aweful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lafell is gonna surprise those blinded by their love of Gettis. I like them both, but i've noticed that quite a few people underestimate Lafells ability. Nonetheless, this team has a bright future!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Razey: LaFell going that higher than Gettis in the draft says something and I see where you're coming from...but I really think Gettis has shown some major play maker skills in him. LaFell reminds me a lot like Moose who worked great as a number 1 at times but also could step into a lesser role to spread the field and let guys like Smitty blow up. Moose & Brandon are even similar physically being 6-2 ~215

Gettis' combination of size, speed, and strength compliment LaFell's abilities and would prove to make more big plays imo. Even though he's only an inch taller, they play differently and their strengths could pair into a lethal combo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Razey: LaFell going that higher than Gettis in the draft says something and I see where you're coming from...but I really think Gettis has shown some major play maker skills in him. LaFell reminds me a lot like Moose who worked great as a number 1 at times but also could step into a lesser role to spread the field and let guys like Smitty blow up. Moose & Brandon are even similar physically being 6-2 ~215

Gettis' combination of size, speed, and strength compliment LaFell's abilities and would prove to make more big plays imo. Even though he's only an inch taller, they play differently and their strengths could pair into a lethal combo

Put Gettis on that jugs machine and let me see balls sticking to his hands then tho mang. Love the Blankman, Beach, but he has to learn how to catch with his hands and there may be an adjustment period where he begins to try to do that with poor results (I hope not). Right now LaFell is more agile and has better hands, plus he knows the spot a lil better to the point where he can play 1 2 or 3 (in the slot).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...