Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

According to PFT, the Panthers are over the cap (by a little)


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Now, it’s time to look at the teams that had some work to do, as of Tuesday, to get under the spending limit.

Per a source with knowledge of the cap numbers, here are the seven teams that were in the red: Raiders ($17.3 million), Steelers ($11.5 million), Texans ($8.5 million), Vikings ($5.6 million), Lions ($5 million), Cowboys ($3.7 million), and Panthers ($939,000).

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/03/as-of-tuesday-seven-teams-were-over-the-cap/
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

From what I understand, I believe we are so close because of the 30 millon dollar signing bonus to CJ. So, after this season, his cap hit will be much, much lower.

But, I could be wrong.

Btw, I made this thread 1st. ;)

I was curious how this was going to work.. we made a lot of (re)acquisitions.

1) is the cap in effect this year? I've heard various reports, but none recently

2) if so, will JR/Hurney pay a lot of that upfront to free up a lot of cap space the next few years?

3) if not, nevermind.. CJ's bonus shouldn't be the only one to relieve us next year..

Link to comment

they aren't the only ones who have provided some cap information..

no, I have seen it from other sources too. I find it hard o believe that they have all the particulars of the entire roster right now though. Plus without even having the first round of cuts, what does it matter. They frustrate me sometimes over there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...