Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Parents sue Urban Outfitters over racy teen photos


GritsRgreat

Recommended Posts

http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/beauty/parents-sue-retailers-and-photographer-over-provocative-shots-of-daughter-used-on-t-shirts-2529083/#photoViewer=1

Photos in link.

One photo appears to show the 15 year old model holding a six pack of beer.

Urban Outfitters and other retailers are being sued for the unauthorized use of photos of a young model that her parents deemed risqué.

According to the New York Post, the pictures of Hailey Clauson were taken by photographer Jason Lee Parry in March 2010, when she was 15 years old. According to the lawsuit by Clauson's parents, Ford Models, her agency at the time, complained about their suggestive nature and Parry agreed to never release the photos. But somehow one image of Clauson straddling a motorcycle in leather hot pants has appeared on a t-shirt at Urban Outfitters. Other images from the photo shoot have popped up on tees at a Los Angeles boutique called Blood Is The New Black and a NYC store called Brandy & Melville. The suit says the shirts "force" Clauson "to be the object of prurient interests and provides wallpaper for the likes of pedophiles," according to the New York Post. Now Clauson's parents are suing all three retailers and the photographer for a total of $28 million in damages.

Some of Clauson's photos may raise eyebrows—in addition to a shot that focuses on her crotch, there is also a picture of the then-15-year-old carrying a six-pack of beer, and one of her wearing an open leather jacket with nothing underneath. But one must wonder why Clauson posed for the provocative shots in the first place. Sometimes photographers push young models beyond their comfort zone, but Parry claims her parents were present at the photo shoot and gave him permission to publish the pictures. Parry told the Post, "The images got stole (sic) from me" and showed up on t-shirts after they were accessible on numerous blogs.

Fashion photography has been known to over-sexualize young women. Some brands, such as American Apparel, often come under fire for their suggestive photos, but when models sign release forms they often waive rights to legally complain.

And there's another questionable element to this story. Earlier this year, Hailey Clauson walked in Diane von Furstenberg's show at age 15, even though the Council of Fashion Designers of America guidelines state that no models under the age of 16 should be hired. Furstenberg herself is the CFDA president, and while she apologized for not verifying Clauson's age on her ID, we wonder why Clauson's parents agreed to let the underage teen walk the runway. After turning 16, Clauson has walked other runway shows for designers like Gucci, Elie Saab, and Giambattista Valli.

We understand why Clauson's parents would be upset about the photos appearing (and making money for retailers) without permission, but who is to blame for the pictures being taken in the first place? And are they really all that racy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0ead83dbcbParry8.jpg.jpg

This was the other photo. Her parents said that this "Crotch Shot" of her was an open invitation to pedophiles.

What, did she get propositioned from a Baptist Minister? (Oh, low blow!)

Oh, but it's must be OK with her parents if she poses like this? Maybe they made more money off of her on this shot?

Hailey_Clauson.jpg

Or her nude photos that are out there. The word for today folks is GOLD-DIGGERS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They built the right supporting cast and landed a great coach. Drafted the wrong QB but a guy like Jones is thriving.  It’s fun to see
    • I think he will be better than healthy Bryce and considerably better than gimped Bryce. Just realize that's a low bar. Don't expect Prime Cam.
    • The Panthers run defense is, dare I say, good. If the Bills haven’t changed anything during the bye, the Panthers could easily win this game. If the Bills actually addressed their offensive issues when they can’t run the ball, they may win by 20. The thing is that they have done a poor job of building around Josh, in my opinion.    His Super Man plays alone could keep the game close if they can’t run but, in the end, I actually think the Panthers win here. It’s a home game, Andy Dalton should bring some juice to the passing game. Their defense has holes everywhere and we have Dowdle and Canales going off in the running game.    Give me Panthers, 27-24. Down 24-20 with 2 minutes left, Dalton finds 15 for a 38 yard touchdown with 22 seconds remaining but the Bills are forced to account for the run because the Panthers still have two timeouts. Bills get into FG range but miss a 57 yard attempt to tie the game.    people begin to doubt Josh Allen without actually looking at what the Bills have put around him, and how their defense is just melting. 
×
×
  • Create New...