Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pryor


carolinarolls

Recommended Posts

He isn't coming into the NFL expecting to play receiver.

If I get him in the NFL draft in the 4th round with the understanding he is going to be developed as a receiver and in a "slash" role, I ****** him up quick. But his agent and he are going to want QB time and money. And I am from Columbus and have been him play a lot of QB. And he will never make it as a QB in the NFL. Worst throwing motion I've seen for a major D1 QB in a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like him as a WR. Not sure what he is doing. Poor management perhaps. I feel like teams are gonna take pass just based on his looking like he is a stubborn kid who will not be coached.

I remember him holding out on national signing day, getting in a little trouble for selling stuff for tats or whatever (no biggie in my book) and not really dominating anything. All this adds up to trouble when you add in the QB thing. There is no doubt he is athletic. I think I would do a 4th for him as a committed receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not worth it. Hell, we can get a 4th rounder next year at WR that will be better and actually have experience playing the position. Plus, he's suspend the first 5 games, there's no use for him.

I remember him holding out on national signing day

I hated when he did that. He thought we were all waiting, anticipating his decision. Just pick a damn college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the Panthers would get him if we awarded a 5th round pick.

I just think it would mess with team chemistry too much.

Even if he was told he is strictly a WR, if Cam got injured there would immediately be questions about putting him at QB.

It is just not a risk that we should or would take, but what do I know, I thought that getting Michael Vick would be a bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how he fits in Carolina at all.

I don't either.

I'm telling you, it makes all the sense in the world that a contending team and not a team in a rebuild flux takes a shot on Pryor. Maybe a team like Dallas; or the NY Giants, or San Diego, someone that is a dark horse in terms of who the media sees taking him. Someone who can afford the gamble of using a roster spot if it doesn't work out but sees boom potential with the guy in a slash role.

Where is Mike Mularkey working these days?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...