Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chud's one-dimensional offense


ncbobcat

Recommended Posts

It's just a different run game. The holes will open for a more traditional run game but the short dump passes to our backs and screens and swings are all by design. It's more or less just an extension of our more traditional run game. Our backs had over 160 all purpose yards today, quitcherbitchen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care how many dimensions it has. It's putting points on the board and setting NFL records. Iron out the wrinkles over the course of the season and let the young guys grow into it, and it's all good.

I think a lot of people are stuck in the "pound the ball" mentality and can't fathom that the running game isn't the focus. That's not the Panthers anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lack of usage and personel in the FB department is one aspect. That aside, I think Chud is really trying to get Cam's growing pains (not much so far) out of the way early. I don't think he's so adverse to the run as he's showing right now. We can run the ball if given half the chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just a different run game. The holes will open for a more traditional run game but the short dump passes to our backs and screens and swings are all by design. It's more or less just an extension of our more traditional run game. Our backs had over 160 all purpose yards today, quitcherbitchen.

I can't complain over 18 yards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care how many dimensions it has. It's putting points on the board and setting NFL records. Iron out the wrinkles over the course of the season and let the young guys grow into it, and it's all good.

I think a lot of people are stuck in the "pound the ball" mentality and can't fathom that the running game isn't the focus. That's not the Panthers anymore.

Records don't win games and for all the passing yardage, we haven't managed 24+ points yet.

Say it with me.....'balance'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

psstt....We're two weeks in.

Okay, then the 400 yard games are a fluke then, right? What you are saying is it will eventaully balance out. Whew, I'm so comforted now by knowing that.

( Oh, good luck telling wagon that 400 yard games will start coming to an end though).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...