Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your input please...


j2sgam

Recommended Posts

I have a moral/money between friends dilemma and once again turn to teh all knowing Huddle on how to handle this situation. I will give it to yous as unbiased as I can, please let me know what yous think is the right answer. I am involved in this situation, but Im not going to say what my part is, until later...I will try leave out most of the details to avoid the tl;dr's

So me & a few friends play poker every month at a buddy's house. Last month a guy showed up thats only been there 3 times and he brought someone nobody knew. Now this is a fairly close group, we play together regularly and its a small money ($30) poker tournament. At some point in the evening somebody decided to take most of the money for the payouts. Payouts were $170 & $100, the thief took $170, and the 2 people that won split the remaining Benjamin, both obviously not getting what each was supposed to. All that was said is "We will figure it out." So now we FF to the next game which took place last weekend..

The guy that won the tourney is looking to the host of the game to cover the money that was stolen. The host does not take any money unless he wins, there is no 'house cut' of the payouts. Is the host of the game financially responsible to reimburse the money that was stolen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The money was left out in the open for all to see. Except for the dude nobody knew, this was a game among friends... I have never run into an issue like this in my 9 years of playing, so I have no idea about the normal right answer... We pretty much know who took it, but nothing can be proven...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally the money is kept out of sight, this was a last minute game and because it was only 8 people the host left the money out, divvied up ready to pay the winners...

I seriously doubt that either of them 2 guys ever come back...

Emptying pockets is in vain, theres no way of knowing how much money a person has in their pockets when they get there... The bill denominations were all $20s & a few $10s...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice try J2.

You had me going for just a bit. I then recalled how we are both in the same trade and thought to myself how a similar situation could have occured had I been involved.

J2 took the money. He figured the new guy would make a convenient scapegoat, snatched the ca$h and said nothing.

Come to find out the new guy was above reproach so J2 comes on here, gives us this pretty story and then he will show the other players that he couldn't have done it because he is going out of his way and using teh huddle brain trust to help figure out who the culprit really was.

Pure fuging genius, OJ........:D

At least that's what I would have done....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand the concerns--he is not P. Sewell or Joe Thomas.  He has technique issues and was not great in the run game and was good in pass protection when UGA did not pass much.  Then there is the immediate need vs long term need perspective.   I did not see Freeland being there-frankly. Here is why:   He has nearly 35" arms and his hands are large (10.5").  He ran a 4.93 40 at the combine.  He is very agile.  His vertical was 33.5".   Physically, he is a freak. He is 21 and he seems very intelligent (coachable). You have to remember, some of these rookies are 24, 25 years old. Freeling is A team player.  His shortcomings are fixable.  Short arms (as with the kids from Utah and Miami) are not fixable.  The Run on OTs began at #9: Fano (picked 10 picks earlier) has 32" arms and his hands are 9".  He did not play in the SEC like Freeling.  Many think the short arms project him to guard. Mauigoa (picked 10th) has 33" arms.  He is a solid player, but his arms make him borderline as a T (they seek 34" and up as ideal)  Kayden Proctor (picked 12th overall) struggled in pass protection and projects by many to RT or G.  Weight management is a concern. So it is possible that Freeling will be the first LT taken who actually plays LT.  (he also has the ability and experience to play RT)  His questions are fixable and not limited to physical limitations.  Here is the question:  If you know that you need a Tackle, and you could choose between all four of these players, who would you pick? I am not sure that Freeling would not be the player I selected if given the opportunity to take any of them.
    • The more I think about this pick the more I like it. The Icky injury might end up being a blessing in disguise for everyone except Icky unfortunately. If Freeling pans out at LT the Panthers have a good player on a rookie contract at a premium position at a time when they’re going to need to potentially pay Bryce for his next contract. Icky was likely going to command a big salary jump for his next contract and now, there’s a strong justification he’s not going to be worth a big money extension until he rehabs and proves he can still play at a high level. Since he’s finishing his rookie deal this season, it will be interesting to see if the Panthers bring him back for the 2027 season. Obviously it’s too early to say and they will probably wait to see how the season pans out with Moton still elite but aging and clearly battling persistent injuries, and they need to see if Freeling can develop into a starter during his rookie year. But ultimately this might have opened up a huge chunk of salary cap for the next 4-5 years. 
    • You read my mind Nastradamus! If Rodriguez is still there I feel like it will be hard to pass on him. And one of these TE we keep drafting have to hit eventually and Delp is just as good as the others.
×
×
  • Create New...