Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

mcdermmott's thoughts on the defense


rayzor

Recommended Posts

one of the benefits of the new coaching regime is that the OCs are allowed to talk to the press. steve reed is capitalizing on this and has a couple new columns as a result. one for mcdermmott and another for chud.

pretty good reads.

excerpt:

Q. Greg Hardy, when he showed up here last year, you could just tell he looked the part even though he was a sixth rounder. Can you talk about his potential because it seems like it might be through the roof?

McDERMOTT: It is. You hit the nail on the head. Potential is a great word for Greg. Just coming in last year and not knowing Greg and what I heard coming in last year is he had a good rookie year but had a lot of room for improvement. But I think Greg would be the first to tell you that. To his credit he’s had a great start to his sophomore season, if you will, and that comes from hard work and attention to detail. He’s done a great job with it.”

.

.

.

Q. With Jon out you’re having James Anderson call the plays in the huddle. How is he handling that role?

McDERMOTT: He’s been phenomenal. He’s been the key to our defense in terms of the huddle call and the communication and the leadership. He is a guy who has experience and he has been the glue to our defense. He’s gotten us lined up and in and out of the huddle and into coverages and my hat goes off to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

q. Jon beason and thomas davis both came over to the hotel on saturday night to talk with some of the younger linebackers even though they didn’t have to. What were thoughts on that?

mcdermott: That took my breath away. It really did. They don’t have to do that. I mean you talk about your leaders, well those are your leaders. Those are guys that just love to be around. I had a couple of words with thomas before the game and after the game and jon in the condition he’s in had to watch it from home, but those guys are an inspiration to all of us because they love to play and love to be around the locker room and i think that has a trickle down affect to the rest of the team.”

212

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Comparing a random stat to another rookie QB has nothing to do with the current subject.  Tom Brady had a 6.0 YPA his rookie year.  I hope you're not using one stat to define success of a QB? It's not a problem to want him to do better based on where he was drafted although I still contend it doesn't matter after the fact.  It doesn't matter if we're talking about Cam Newton, Tom Brady, Russel Wilson or any other QB.  It makes little difference once you're in the NFL.  Nobody gets a ring for where they were drafted.   Higher draft picks will get a little more time in most cases as teams want to make sure they've exhausted all avenues before they admit a draft pick can't play.  Other teams might pick them up thinking it wasn't the player but the organization and/or other coaches that caused the player not to succeed.  It's people's expectations that are wrong.  If we could go back and redo all the draft and put guys in the correct draft spot based on how well they played in the NFL, that would be nice.  Then your argument would make some sense.  People assume that where a player was drafted is a statement on how good that player is when the reality is there is a lot more luck than skill in drafting. If Coker turns into a pro bowl receiver and XL becomes a bust nobody cares except fans and the media. What we really should say is it's not too much to expect a player who has started at QB for a team over the last 2 years to be better than he currently shows.   Don't compare 1st round picks.  Compare starting QB's in the NFL.
    • They’re gonna have to go up against a real offense before any kind of judgement can be made of them.  Tlaw looks like damaged goods, Kyler is completely washed, and Penix….well…. they look better compared to last season but that’s what you’d expect with a healthy brown and horn.  I haven’t seen anything that indicates they’ll be considered an overall good defense when the dust has settled. 2002 it is not. 
×
×
  • Create New...