How the fug?

[caatfan]

Despite the fact that both teams are somewhat different from last year's versions, Da Bears were playing on Jan. 23rd, '11. The Panthers were licking their wounds from a 2 win season. So I'd say (in addition to to it being an away game) that the perception is their 1-2 record is better than our 1-2 record.

[Guest Jacob3-89]

Too lazy to change avatar, next person to post an image decides my avatar forever.

[Herbert The Love Bug]

pootie on all this noise yo

[Ivan The Awesome]

Oh nohz1!! Dizreecepectedz agenz!

[Khaki Lackey]

Under. Under. Undercats! Hooooo!

Ha! That's the first thing that popped in my head when I read that, snarf.

[jtnc]

All the analysts selected the Pats over the Bills, because of obvious reasons. But were they right? No.

[LiQuiD]

Too lazy to change avatar, next person to post an image decides my avatar forever.

[footballisasport]

All the analysts selected the Pats over the Bills, because of obvious reasons. But were they right? No.

I actually went out on a limb and said the Bills were going to win over the Pat on Sunday. I wished I had bet someone...Darnit..

Those who make a living predicting who is going to wins every Sunday are swayed by their baises to a team. Many of these talking heads are ex-football players who are very nostalalgic.

Plus, I much prefer u guys proving the naysayer wrong or putting enough beat down on a team that they take notice just like u did in ur previous two games. For a team that isn't 3-0 u're very much talked about. Continue to make believers out of those who act like they know..

Sidenote, despite what the Bills are doing, do u guys really feel these pundits are going to say they have a chance at the Superbowl? NO.

[Carolina Mike II]

Too lazy to change avatar, next person to post an image decides my avatar forever.

LiQuids or you could always go with......

[Mother Grabber]

Under. Under. Undercats! Hooooo!

We're the Carolina Panthros