Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How long do you give Deangelo Williams?


CarolinaCatBrigade

Recommended Posts

you're right. Quality depth at such a skiill position is a luxury, until your top 2 are hurt....then it's no longer a luxury.

I understand, fans would rather weaken a team, then to keep one of it's strenghts.

Great debate.

I'm pretty sure fans that were okay with letting Williams walk were so in hopes of spending that money to strengthen other positions, seeing as we were still deep at rb without him. Not to just let him go for the sake of being cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're right. Quality depth at such a skiill position is a luxury, until your top 2 are hurt....then it's no longer a luxury.

I understand, fans would rather weaken a team, then to keep one of it's strenghts.

Great debate.

just a heads up...

Running back is no longer a skill position. What happens is Cam gets hurt....maybe should try to sign Tom Brady to back him up. And if he gets hurt we will sign Rivers. Pantherclaw logic

Maybe you should understand other factors like age, depth at position, and relevance in the offense. I'm fine with the contract if he can produce like he did that 1 year or it doesn't hamper us trying to sign a position of weakness in the future

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fine with the contract if he can produce like he did that 1 year or it doesn't hamper us trying to sign a position of weakness in the future

I think there was more than 1 year. in 2007, 2008 and 2009 Dwill averaged 5.0. 5.5 and 5.2 yards per rush attempt. Those are Superman numbers. Admittedly in 2007 DWill had only 144 rushing attempts because Fox continued to trot out an inferior Deshaun Foster onto the field.

2010 saw an injury marred campaign. I agree if DWill can produce like he did for 3 years without hindering future contracts it's a good contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just a heads up...

Running back is no longer a skill position. What happens is Cam gets hurt....maybe should try to sign Tom Brady to back him up. And if he gets hurt we will sign Rivers. Pantherclaw logic

Maybe you should understand other factors like age, depth at position, and relevance in the offense. I'm fine with the contract if he can produce like he did that 1 year or it doesn't hamper us trying to sign a position of weakness in the future

you sure love to put words in other peoples mouths. Makes you a delusional, asuming SOB.

Oh wait..that's nothing new with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you sure love to put words in other peoples mouths. Makes you a delusional, asuming SOB.

Oh wait..that's nothing new with you.

lol

I like that you are a curmudgeon 24/7.

We have differing opinions which is fine. If you had simply said that without trying to apply your "logic" I wouldn't have to sit here and try and understand it. Thus coming across as a delusional assuming SOB is unavoidable because what you say makes absolutely no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Clark played 2 seasons in college and had a grand total of 1,340 yards with 6 TDs. T-Mac had 1,402 and 10 as a Sophomore and 1,319 and 8 as a Junior in one less game since they didn't make a bowl (not to mention his 702 and 8 as a Freshman). Chark's only 1,000 yard NFL season (which was only 1,008 yards to begin with, and only 3 games over 79 yards that year) came in an offense where the only other non RB's in the offense to have more than 35 targets were Chris Conely (90 targets for 775 yards) and Dede Westbrook (101 targets for 660 yards).  His 2nd best season, his competition for targets was Keelan Cole Sr (88 targets for 642 yards), Laviska (79 targets for 600) and Conley again (63 targets for 471). Beyond his 1k season, he had seasons of 706, 525, 502, 174, 154, and 31 yards, despite being the #1 WR on his team for 3 of his 4 seasons that he had over 174 yards. Any 1st round WR should already be considered a better WR than that, let alone one taken in the Top 10 and has the college statistics that T-Mac had.  Had we traded back and taken Egbuka or Golden, I'd still be saying the same thing about them vs Chark, this has nothing to do with my personal love of T-Mac. 
    • I'm not sure his idea of us being 28th at the start of the season isn't wrong. It's hard to project who we are based off the fact all the rookies we are depending on to contribute but know nothing about. we don't know what derrick brown looks like week 1.. hunter renfrow t-mac,legette, and our tight ends. we are going to have two new starting safeties no matter what. I think it's hard to know just which way the dial can swing on this roster.
    • That's certainly what we hope but c'mon... stating it as fact when he's never played a down of NFL football? 
×
×
  • Create New...