Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cosell: Cats a mirage


Fireball77

Recommended Posts

The Panthers are predictable, but they have talent. Many teams can gameplan the Panthers successfully and move the ball up and down the field, but the players and the scheme have allowed them, for the most part, to pull some of the games out of their arses.

If the Panthers don't come up with a couple of key plays in a couple of games (I can think of the Rosario catch and the Godfrey interception just off the top of my head), the Panthers could easily be 7-5 or worse.

This doesn't bode well for the Panthers in the next four games or the playoffs (if they make the playoffs) UNLESS the coaching staff can fix the issues or come up with a new wrinkle that teams haven't seen yet. This staff HAS done that in the past - the last couple of games at the end of last year, for example - so it isn't as if they CAN'T do it. It's just that, to this point, they haven't done so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers are predictable, but they have talent. Many teams can gameplan the Panthers successfully and move the ball up and down the field, but the players and the scheme have allowed them, for the most part, to pull some of the games out of their arses.

If the Panthers don't come up with a couple of key plays in a couple of games (I can think of the Rosario catch and the Godfrey interception just off the top of my head), the Panthers could easily be 7-5 or worse.

This doesn't bode well for the Panthers in the next four games or the playoffs (if they make the playoffs) UNLESS the coaching staff can fix the issues or come up with a new wrinkle that teams haven't seen yet. This staff HAS done that in the past - the last couple of games at the end of last year, for example - so it isn't as if they CAN'T do it. It's just that, to this point, they haven't done so.

This could be said about our 03 team, we had slumps and inconsistent play at times. And we barely got by in a ton of our games from some lucky or amazing plays. You can say what if all you want, but the fact is that we're 9-3. The Chargers have lost lots of games this year from a lucky play or a last second field goal, same with the Packers. But once again, the Packers are 5-7 and the Chargers are 4-8. Regardless, a wins a win, and if you know anything you know a John Fox coached team will step it up when it comes to playoff time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As painful as it is, he's right on most points. Fortunately, we are in great shape record-wise and have time to improve. I do beleive it was the Giants who were in this situation about this time last year. We have the talent we just need to get firing on all cylinders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mostly spot on

But i question this statement

"Quote " Only 40 percent of their runs hit the mark. By way of example, almost 45 percent of the Giants’ runs produce 4+ yards. That’s a significant difference. "Quote "

How is almost 5 % more a significant difference ??

Would not 10 to 15 % more be a significant difference !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mostly spot on

but i question this statement

"quote " only 40 percent of their runs hit the mark. By way of example, almost 45 percent of the giants’ runs produce 4+ yards. That’s a significant difference. "quote "

how is almost 5 % more a significant difference ??

Would not 10 to 15 % more be a significant difference !

the mirage here is!!!!

Carolina had 5 1 yard carries last week!

Terrible for that stat!

But guess what, they were all from the 1 yard line!

Get it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the Panthers fall short in that crucial category. They are in the bottom third of the league. Only 40 percent of their runs hit the mark. By way of example, almost 45 percent of the Giants’ runs produce 4+ yards. That’s a significant difference.

bieng 5% behind the best OL in football is not that crucial.

And who says that is a crucial stat anyways?

More like meaningless to me.

I think this guy forgot what winning football is. Its not 3rd down %, 4+ yard run % or all those meaningless stats. Its having guys that will stand up and win games for you. Jake, Smitty, D Will, Beason and Harris have proven again and again they can make these type of plays this season. Combine these guys with ball control, limited turnovers and a stingy athletic playmaking defense and you have a recipe to win. This guy should be happy with his meaningless game film stats. And I will be happy with our team as is. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of what the stats and media says, the only thing that matters is whether you win or not at the end of the game. A win is a win is a win.

That being said, this team has shown in the past they can play at a higher level in the playoffs. It's been getting in that's been the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's a solid article, he's wrong about peppers and the LBs but he's right that the schemes and team play is inconsistent

I feel right now like our defensive pressure doesn't scare anyone at all and neither does the run game, sure we can take it to you if you let us, but good teams feel like they can stop easily it seems, when we get beat we get beat thoroughly, and we've gotten raped twice through the air

I feel kind of like we are the 13-3 ravens from a few years ago, until the team proves otherwise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the mirage here is!!!!

Carolina had 5 1 yard carries last week!

Terrible for that stat!

But guess what, they were all from the 1 yard line!

Get it?

Yeah. To me, that's a huge stat. In 06 and 07, the Panthers had about 6-7 rushing TD's for the whole season, and they had to run a couple of end arounds to the WR's to get that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very few of us on here watch as much football as

an NFL coach but we can call Panther plays with a 70% accuracy.

Play, Formation, Protection, & Snap Count. Thats a lot to get right to hit that 70% mark. This isn't Madden theres more to it than pushing the blue button. Or perhaps you think running a draw out the Power I and running a delay out of the shotgun are the same play because they're both runs up the middle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Play, Formation, Protection, & Snap Count. Thats a lot to get right to hit that 70% mark. This isn't Madden theres more to it than pushing the blue button. Or perhaps you think running a draw out the Power I and running a delay out of the shotgun are the same play because they're both runs up the middle.

We are VERY predictable, only a fool would argue otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...