Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Take a chance on Terrell Owens

Gscottnc5

By Gscottnc5,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Boxhead85 Apprentice

Boxhead85

Posted
Posted

I was discussing this on a podcast me and some friends were recording earlier tonight. I've always like the talent of T.O. Sure, he is arrogant as hell, but he's not a prick like LeBron or Tom Brady. I am for bringing him in because I think he would do nothing but help the team. Sure, he drops a lot of balls, but imagine what defenses would have to do defending Steve, T.O., and hopefully, worrying about our rushing attack? We'd be unstoppable...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gscottnc5 Newbie

Gscottnc5

Posted
  • Author
Posted

No way we let TO come in and fug the chemistry this team is building.

That's what alot of people used to say about Shockey. I think guys like Shockey and TO have toned themselves down enough to understand to be loud on the field and not on the sideline. I remember seeing Shockey on the sidelines in NY going bolistic. Maybe TO has had the same change of heart

Just sayin... just wanted to see what others thought.

And by the looks of some of the intelligent comments*sarcasm* the huddle has become a dumping ground for half brain dead idiots that only now how to post a gif or try to be a smartarse and have nothing better to do than to think they are the next andrew dice clay

KG - I am in no way implying your post. Your post was intelligent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...