Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Take a chance on Terrell Owens


Gscottnc5

Recommended Posts

I was discussing this on a podcast me and some friends were recording earlier tonight. I've always like the talent of T.O. Sure, he is arrogant as hell, but he's not a prick like LeBron or Tom Brady. I am for bringing him in because I think he would do nothing but help the team. Sure, he drops a lot of balls, but imagine what defenses would have to do defending Steve, T.O., and hopefully, worrying about our rushing attack? We'd be unstoppable...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way we let TO come in and fug the chemistry this team is building.

That's what alot of people used to say about Shockey. I think guys like Shockey and TO have toned themselves down enough to understand to be loud on the field and not on the sideline. I remember seeing Shockey on the sidelines in NY going bolistic. Maybe TO has had the same change of heart

Just sayin... just wanted to see what others thought.

And by the looks of some of the intelligent comments*sarcasm* the huddle has become a dumping ground for half brain dead idiots that only now how to post a gif or try to be a smartarse and have nothing better to do than to think they are the next andrew dice clay

KG - I am in no way implying your post. Your post was intelligent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...