Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our rookie DT's


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

Let's hope so bc the rest of our defense is suffering a bit from their play. I think McClain has more promise than Fua! I've seen Fua just stink it up to much but that's just my opinion. As for the rest, we should have signed better vets until the rooks get a grip. I know this isn't Madden and you can't always pull the right strings, but this isn't Pop Warner either where everyone has to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like our young tackles.

They are playing hard, and not giving up.

If they were the sole reason for our run defense, I'd be more critical of them, but our other guys are blowing their assignments also.

I agree that our defense as a whole needs to be versed on the concept of tackling. Just something I noticed last game was that Chicago was blowing up our D-line and making it into our linebackers. Poor tackling was evident, but our DT's was a big reason for the 224 yards rushing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting reps...that plus some good film study. Are they going to get better....soon?

I've seen definite improvement in their 3-technique since the beginning of the season. At the beginning of the year, they were getting pushed off their gaps pretty badly. It will still happen from time to time, but they are definitely faring much better in that regard.

Though it isn't always Fua, our DTs don't really do well in a 3-4 as a NT. That is where I've seen the biggest failures on the inside with respect to stopping the run. The biggest thing is our LBs missing their gaps or flat out not tackling. From what I can tell, this is where Rivera has seemed most frustrated.

We actually fared a little better when Beason got hurt with respect to run D. It is why I surmised that he was injured prior to coming out for the season. However, when TD went down, our run D dropped DRAMATICALLY.

I haven't heard anything on the Curry front, but I would be interested to see if we can turn things around both with him and us. Listening to Sirius radio, Gil Brandt said that the thing that struck him most by watching Curry is that he has seemed to have lost the desire to play. Perhaps if we get him back closer to familiar ground and with a new staff he can incur new life. Being a WF fan, I am used to seeing him exhibit a motor that simply did NOT quit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting reps...that plus some good film study. Are they going to get better....soon?

I noticed the combo of Fua/Fields quite a bit in the Chicago game. This probably isn't a knock on McClain as much as a desire by Rivera to get some more beef in the middle. They seemed to be pretty effective, but it was a small sample size because Chicago found they could just run to the outside for big gains.

One thing I really like about McClain...when he is in the game, he never gives up on a play and goes to the whistle, sometimes way downfield. Effort certainly isn't a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of the reason that Connor and the other LBs blow some assignments is because they're forced to do too much to make up for a lack of support up front. With a line that generates some push into the backfield and ate up a lot of the blocks, I think our LBs would look a lot better. Right now every single defensive player is being blocked on a lot of plays, there simply nothing that they can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen definite improvement in their 3-technique since the beginning of the season. At the beginning of the year, they were getting pushed off their gaps pretty badly. It will still happen from time to time, but they are definitely faring much better in that regard.

Though it isn't always Fua, our DTs don't really do well in a 3-4 as a NT. That is where I've seen the biggest failures on the inside with respect to stopping the run. The biggest thing is our LBs missing their gaps or flat out not tackling. From what I can tell, this is where Rivera has seemed most frustrated.

We actually fared a little better when Beason got hurt with respect to run D. It is why I surmised that he was injured prior to coming out for the season. However, when TD went down, our run D dropped DRAMATICALLY.

I haven't heard anything on the Curry front, but I would be interested to see if we can turn things around both with him and us. Listening to Sirius radio, Gil Brandt said that the thing that struck him most by watching Curry is that he has seemed to have lost the desire to play. Perhaps if we get him back closer to familiar ground and with a new staff he can incur new life. Being a WF fan, I am used to seeing him exhibit a motor that simply did NOT quit.

Uh we are a 4-3 D. I think you meant a 1 tech (2 gap DT or 4-3 NT) which I do believe is a concern. McClain has improved and so has Fua (to a lesser extent). Personally I think its still up in the air and while I am optimistic and hope for the best, I also believe in preparing for the worst. DT should still be a top priority in this draft. I see us using our 4th on one. I like Mike Martin from Michigan.

I think our LB were more to blame however for Forte going off. There was a lot of sloppy play at the 2nd level especially in containment. I would love us to get Curry as I think he would sure up the SLB position allowing Anderson to play WLB where he is better suited. A lineup of Anderson, Beason, Curry would cover up a lot of weaknesses of Curry (much better at stopping the run then coverage) and that would be a pretty bright future at LB even minus TD (who I believe is too much of a liability to ever bet the future on again). I just hope its for Clausen and a conditional pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh we are a 4-3 D. I think you meant a 1 tech (2 gap DT or 4-3 NT) which I do believe is a concern. McClain has improved and so has Fua (to a lesser extent). Personally I think its still up in the air and while I am optimistic and hope for the best, I also believe in preparing for the worst. DT should still be a top priority in this draft. I see us using our 4th on one. I like Mike Martin from Michigan.

I think our LB were more to blame however for Forte going off. There was a lot of sloppy play at the 2nd level especially in containment. I would love us to get Curry as I think he would sure up the SLB position allowing Anderson to play WLB where he is better suited. A lineup of Anderson, Beason, Curry would cover up a lot of weaknesses of Curry (much better at stopping the run then coverage) and that would be a pretty bright future at LB even minus TD (who I believe is too much of a liability to ever bet the future on again). I just hope its for Clausen and a conditional pick.

Regarding the 3-4 vs 4-3, we've done both. It was sparing with Fua being the only NT option after Edwards was lost for the season. You would see an occasional mix with the "NASCAR" package where McClain was moved to LDE and Norwood was brought in as the 4th LB. I don't recall seeing Hardy being in for that package though I didn't have time to go back over the games like I normally do.

With Applewhite being signed, I don't see much indication that we'll pursue those types of packages as the season goes on. I think TD really allowed that to do as well as it did when we were successful with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the 3-4 vs 4-3, we've done both. It was sparing with Fua being the only NT option after Edwards was lost for the season. You would see an occasional mix with the "NASCAR" package where McClain was moved to LDE and Norwood was brought in as the 4th LB. I don't recall seeing Hardy being in for that package though I didn't have time to go back over the games like I normally do.

With Applewhite being signed, I don't see much indication that we'll pursue those types of packages as the season goes on. I think TD really allowed that to do as well as it did when we were successful with it.

When was that. At no time would I consider our D successful. More like lesser degrees of lousy. Our D needs serious work that has been apparent for the entire season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...