Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We've lost 19 of our past 22 games, Hurney is safe?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

We had the worst offense in football last season, Hurney is safe?

We have the worst defense in football this season, Hurney is safe?

We have had 3 of our worst drafts in franchise history 2009-2011 (not counting Cam of course), Hurney is safe?

We're 1-5 for the second straight year, Hurney is safe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

unless hurney personally tore davis' knee..beason's achilles and edwards tricep..I think he might be safe.

Such a bullshit excuse. We were terrible on defense even before the injuries started and it's Hurney's responsibility to hit on later-round draft picks to give us depth. And besides, the linebackers are still the best unit on the D even with the injuries. Where is the talent in the healthy secondary and healthy defensive line?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such a bullpoo excuse. We were terrible on defense even before the injuries started and it's Hurney's responsibility to hit on later-round draft picks to give us depth. And besides, the linebackers are still the best unit on the D even with the injuries. Where is the talent in the healthy secondary and healthy defensive line?

Idk about all of that. Losing Beast, TD and Edwards definitely is showing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have had 3 of our worst drafts in franchise history 2009-2011 (not counting Cam of course), Hurney is safe?

It kinda hit me recently just how different things might be if they hadn't wasted picks on Brown, Clausen and Edwards. If Cam continues to play well I'd say Hurney's job is safe but the next draft is going to be HUGE in determining how the team fares next year. There are holes everywhere with the exception of RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...