Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton vs Christian Ponder


Zithers

Recommended Posts

Caused by the pressure of their vastly improved DLine?

But yet they still get gashed by 135 per game on the ground and still give up 25 points a game? Doubt it.

The entire team only has four sacks and two are from the d-line, the other two is from a safety and a linebacker. And only four tackles for loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Vikings won't be able to beat us with the running game alone. No team has done that this year. Even Chicago needed some help from special teams and a defensive score. And Minnesota's pass defense is nearly as bad as our rushing defense.

Not saying that we will win easily, but all things being equal, I do think we will win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But yet they still get gashed by 135 per game on the ground and still give up 25 points a game? Doubt it.

The entire team only has four sacks and two are from the d-line, the other two is from a safety and a linebacker. And only four tackles for loss.

I was just being a dick in the first place, but pressure is not the same as sacks.

Sacks wouldn't cause interceptions becasue they QB would have been down. Pressure causes interceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, but my point is that if they are getting gashed everywhere else and not even able to bring runners down in the backfield, I really don't think that their attitude against pass blocking would drastically differ enough to get significant pressure regularly. Maybe the new defensive coordinator is running crafty schemes to confuse the QBs or maybe their secondary is just that good, but I don't see how that line is deserves majority credit, if any. Other than Dareus, which is only because of being drafted high, their D-line starters aren't at all noteworthy.

I don't watch the Bills so I don't know, but it doesn't add up enough for me to believe that Dareus has been this un-noticed dominant force that has helped the Bills tremendously and is the reason they are doing well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys freak out so much it's dishearting..Did AP go off when we had Nick Hayden as a starting DT in 2009? No he didn't, and we weren't an awesome run stopping defense then either. Let each game come and stop overreacting and thinking every top RB is gonna score 30 points on us by themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...