Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jay Jay (Cutler) Just Wants to Be Loved

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

Coach Fox is in the business of undying love. His loyalty to Jake Delhomme is unequaled, and this makes many raise eyebrows because Jake has lost some of that shine of his youth. But, Foxy loves the security and comfort that his relationship with his QB offers, so it will take a gargantuan effort to pull his eyes and heart in another direction. This can be viewed an admirable thing, especially when your QB ain't puttin' out like he used to.

But, there is another jilted QB who feels slighted and under-appreciated. This QB is young and hot, just looking for a place to call home. Cutler just wants to be appreciated for what he brings to the house, and doesn't want to be thrown out on the street corner to the highest bidder on a whim of a young and dumb new coach.

Looking from the outside in, it would appear that perhaps Foxie and Jay Jay would be a match made in heaven. Foxie loves to love---even when it hurts---and Jay Jay just wants to be loved.

Stokin' the fires of love. Ain't it a beautiful thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
  • Author
Posted

What got Cutler's panties in a wad to begin with is Mickey D's "loyalty" to his old "spouse" (I think that's what this analogy is). I don't thing either HC is operating out of loyalty though, so the analogy doesn't ring true to me

So you're saying that Fox is not operating out of loyalty on some level? Does he just believe that Delhomme gives the organization its best chance of dancing in February? Or, is he just placing Jake on a pedestal because he has no other option? Which is it? Is it a combination of the two? Loyalty doesn't fit into the equation? Come on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mantal Newbie

mantal

Posted
Posted

Another Cutler to the Panthers thread?

Do we not have enough already?

Please make it stop. My head hurts. It's either Cutler to the Panthers, Jake sux or Fox sux or Pepper sux. That's all anyone seems to be able to comment on these days. At least, if you're going to be a Negative Nancy, find something original...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Skew Newbie

Skew

Posted
Posted

Please make it stop. My head hurts. It's either Cutler to the Panthers, Jake sux or Fox sux or Pepper sux. That's all anyone seems to be able to comment on these days. At least, if you're going to be a Negative Nancy, find something original...

I'm trying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Please make it stop. My head hurts. It's either Cutler to the Panthers, Jake sux or Fox sux. That's all anyone seems to be able to comment on these days. At least, if you're going to be a Negative Nancy, find something original...

Now, now. You have never heard me flat out say that either Fox or Delhomme sucks. I have questioned their wearing out their welcome, but I don't think either of them suck. I have basically resigned myself to the fact that they will both be here for at least 3 more years regardless of what we all think.

In regards to Cutler, I think it's still a valid philosophical question until that situation is put to rest. He still wants to go, and the coach basically said he is their guy unless another option that is better for the Broncos comes along.

Negative? Why does this have to be negative?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mantal Newbie

mantal

Posted
Posted

Now, now. You have never heard me flat out say that either Fox or Delhomme sucks. I have questioned their wearing out their welcome, but I don't think either of them suck. I have basically resigned myself to the fact that they will both be here for at least 3 more years regardless of what we all think.

In regards to Cutler, I think it's still a valid philosophical question until that situation is put to rest. He still wants to go, and the coach basically said he is their guy unless another option that is better for the Broncos comes along.

I had just come on and started reading a novella about how bad Fox and the organization were and how uncommitted they are to winning, (yes after last season), then came in here to read a re-hash, (no offense) of another Cutler thread and snapped. Of course it's still a valid philosophical question until it's resolved, I just wish you'd pulled up one of the other 100 Cutler threads to post your comments rather than start the 101th one...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I had just come on and started reading a novella about how bad Fox and the organization were and how uncommitted they are to winning, (yes after last season), then came in here to read a re-hash, (no offense) of another Cutler thread and snapped. Of course it's still a valid philosophical question until it's resolved, I just wish you'd pulled up one of the other 100 Cutler threads to post your comments rather than start the 101th one...

OK, I see your point. But, I kind of believe that though you guys may argue about the technicalities of the thread, perhaps you just don't want to talk about Cutler anymore---whether in this thread, or any. I will leave it alone since it's obviously upsetting some of you.

you mean Va Jay Jay wants to be loved

That's classic! This thread was worth it just for that comment alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Off Season Thread

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • PanthersNCSU
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • TD alt
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By TD alt · Posted

      Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...