Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lets be honest...


Snake

Recommended Posts

This is what lost us the game.

Jarrod Allen: He beat Gross badly yesterday and cause 2 turnovers.

Vikings Oline: They manhandled Johnson in pass protection and allowed Ponder to roll to his side on allot of plays.

Our LB: They did a good job stopping AP but got handled in the passing game allowing loads of catches up the middle.

Playing conservative: After we were up a TD and Gross was having trouble with Allen we went into a shell. That resulted in three 3 and out plays. I understand we dont trust our defense and Allen had made two big plays but it cost us the game by not gambling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cams two fumbles is what lost the game end of story. If people can't see that then they are a clueless hugger.

It didnt lose us the game but it did effect how we played in the second half. We went out and thought we could run the ball on them and it failed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that was the best front-7 we have faced up to this point. They sure played like it.

Allen was huge when Cam dropped back to pass.

When Cam went to run, their LB #50 was always there to hit him at the LOS.

Everyone picked a very bad day to play like poo at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Fumble right before half time was the real killer. No way we should have let them tie the game right before the half so they could take that momentum into the looker room. At on point I thin the Vikings were 5 of 6 on 3rd conversions in the second half. Teams have been exploiting the fact that with no Jon Beason or TD our middle of the feild the place to throw late in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing conservative: After we were up a TD and Gross was having trouble with Allen we went into a shell. That resulted in three 3 and out plays. I understand we dont trust our defense and Allen had made two big plays but it cost us the game by not gambling.

We're going to be an aggressive, physical football team, whether we're running the football, throwing the football, pass protecting or tackling, I want it to be a physical, no-nonsense, get-the-job-done identity."

:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29th against the rush. Probably the biggest single reason Panthers lost...

We really didnt play the run all that bad. Ponder throwing to his TEs uncontested and allowing him to stand in the pocket without pressure was our failure yesterday not the run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that on at least one play Allen ran right past Gross almost untouched (with nobody attacking the inside gap) and caused a fumble.

There's no shame in getting beat by Allen, he's making a bid for MVP, but it's troubling when he runs right past your elite LT without being touched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...