Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Obligatory "Do We Sign This Released Player?" Thread: Albert Haynesworth

Proudiddy

By Proudiddy,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Cold Cat Explorer

Cold Cat

Posted
Posted

I don't see any reason for not giving him a shot. Sign him. Hopefully it all works out and we'll have help in a position of need for years to come. Give him a incentive based contract (again if things work out) to keep him motivated.

If he becomes a cancer cut him. Nothing vested in him now. Its not like we are trading away anything to get a solid starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SevenSixes Newbie

SevenSixes

Posted
Posted

Ok, let's look at what we are really talking about.

Some want us to cut a spot to potentially bring in a 30 year old DT who hasn't really performed up to expectations at 3 teams. We will have to spend extra time in practice to get him to learn the playbook and calls for his position while we continue to try to develop 2 rookies who currently look confused and lack the gas to finish.

So, can we get this guy to perform with a short time to learn the system?

Is he a "stop gap" or is he "the answer"?

If he's a stop gap player we would have at the most 4-6 games that he will be effective in *if he gives the effort*. Couldn't we still win those games without him?

Shouldn't we opt to spend the practice reps and coaching time on the two guys that we've been investing in for the past 4 months? Most likely we will have to decide between Fua and McClain this off season as to who will remain. Why shouldn't we take the next 8 games to fully evaluate these two, instead of trying to teach a lazy old vet how we do stuff around here..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Derrick Brown appreciation thread.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Joe Person: Ickey is expected to be extended, Mays is someone we want to keep long term, TE, LB and OLB are our biggest needs heading into the offseason

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • Shocker
      2025 College Football Thread

      By Shocker · Posted

      I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...