Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Tebow success get under Cam's skin


usmcpanthers

Recommended Posts

Actually, yes it is. You have just hit the nail in the head and if you only knew how true that actually is, I wouldn't be bitching as much. It's counter intuitive, but it is exactly 100% true backed up by every statistic imaginable.

If that's the case its the defense fault that offense scores less points than the other team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey nobody's bitching about Cam Newton being a rookie. Once again, I get that part. I just hate it when people try to put the blame on some other part of the team when that's the primary reason we're losing, while our defense has been the more efficient side of this team.
thats the dumbest poo I have seen in a while.its the offense fault that the defense give up 30 points a game.
Actually, yes it is. You have just hit the nail in the head and if you only knew how true that actually is, I wouldn't be bitching as much. It's counter intuitive, but it is exactly 100% true backed up by every statistic imaginable.

:lol: all of you arguing against this baffoon...realize that you are arguing against a brick wall that believes that it's the offenses fault that teams score on the defense.

you can't fix this.

you can't correct it.

you can't make it better.

you can't make him smarter.

it just won't happen.

he is a finished product full of stupid with access to the internet and a lot of numbers that he twists and turns to these long nonsensical posts using a lot of words that i just can't believe you waste time reading and responding to.

you are seriously only wasting your time dealing with this clown.

find something better to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey nobody's bitching about Cam Newton being a rookie. Once again, I get that part. I just hate it when people try to put the blame on some other part of the team when that's the primary reason we're losing, while our defense has been the more efficient side of this team.

:lol:, :out:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: all of you arguing against this baffoon...realize that you are arguing against a brick wall that believes that it's the offenses fault that teams score on the defense.

you can't fix this.

you can't correct it.

you can't make it better.

you can't make him smarter.

it just won't happen.

he is a finished product full of stupid with access to the internet and a lot of numbers that he twists and turns to these long nonsensical posts using a lot of words that i just can't believe you waste time reading and responding to.

you are seriously only wasting your time dealing with this clown.

find something better to do.

LOL. You have about as much football logic and sense as a brick.

Of course it's the offense's fault. The defense can't turn over the ball. They don't have it. They can only take it away and give it to the defense. They can only help an offense out.

An offense can turn it over and kill a defense. I know this is difficult for you to figure this one out, but do try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey nobody's bitching about Cam Newton being a rookie. Once again, I get that part. I just hate it when people try to put the blame on some other part of the team when that's the primary reason we're losing, while our defense has been the more efficient side of this team.

you're joking right!!!??? First off, i will be the FIRST to say that Newton DOES deserve SOME blame for the losses, but only some. for example, the Vikings game, those fumbles were costly considering where they were, BUT the defense has NOT been efficient. Example, Chris Johnson has been off this year, but when he plays Carolina, he gets 100 yards. the other team's tight ends usually abuse Carolina's defense, sorry, but the defense is as big a part of the losing as Cam is, but the biggest issue is special teams, i really feel like i am watching San Diego because of how bad the special teams have been. we dont have good returns, we give up big returns and we miss field goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen a opponent totally shut down The Golden Calf of Bristol, have yet to see anyone totally shut down Cam...

like i wrote, when it comes to The Golden Calf of Bristol, he's not there as a passer, i call him very raw. the best thing he does though is run and i like his vision as a runner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're joking right!!!??? First off, i will be the FIRST to say that Newton DOES deserve SOME blame for the losses, but only some. for example, the Vikings game, those fumbles were costly considering where they were, BUT the defense has NOT been efficient. Example, Chris Johnson has been off this year, but when he plays Carolina, he gets 100 yards. the other team's tight ends usually abuse Carolina's defense, sorry, but the defense is as big a part of the losing as Cam is, but the biggest issue is special teams, i really feel like i am watching San Diego because of how bad the special teams have been. we dont have good returns, we give up big returns and we miss field goals.

And you're entitled to your opinion, but when it comes to the most inefficient side of our football team, it has without a doubt been the offense. But after 9 games this is where we currently stand. It's actually been a lot like this all year.

Estimated efficiency rating at league average schedule and turnover/takeaway avg:

(3.8 points/50 yards or 15.67 ypp for an average offense)

Carolina Panthers

Offense: 18.3 Rank 24

Defense: 14.53 Rank 20

Special teams have been bad no doubt, but not nearly as inefficient as the offense. At an even turnover margin, the defense simply does a better job at stopping opponents than the offense does at scoring. And this makes since if you consider the fact they have done this in just about every game after our offense has given them the lead. But our offense, can't score to win the game, even though our defense gives them more chances than anybody.

Take a look:

Red-zone scoring scoring attempts(TD):

6 th Carolina 3.7

Red-zone scoring percentage(TD)

20 Carolina 45.45%

Points per field goal attempts:

26 Carolina 2.3

Red-zone opponent scoring attempts:

23 Carolina 3.4

Red-zone defense(TD's) :

21 Carolina 54.84%

The offense has been equally as bad at scoring as the defense as stopping teams from scoring, but the offense has had more tries than 26 other teams in the league. And score less points. This makes you a very bad and inefficient offense. There's no defense in the NFL that could help this offense win their games with the way they are playing. Not even the Lions who force almost a fumble per game. They can't make up for the amount of lost scoring opportunities. No defense currently playing int the NFL can make up for their screw ups.

Just a fact. But ours has probably done one of the best jobs at trying to keep them in the game despite their inefficiency. If our D had just an averagely efficient offense, they would be top 10 in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i still put more blame on special teams and i still dont think the defense has been that great. they arent awful, no, but they have issues stopping the run and TEs. i mean if the defense was efficent then Chris Johnson would've had less than 100 yards on the ground. the offense hasnt been the best it can be, no, but they arent the main reason for losing in my book. they are keeping us in the game, if we didnt have Newton and had The Golden Calf of Bristol, unless we built an offense good for him, we lose by more points in all the games played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, yes it is. You have just hit the nail in the head and if you only knew how true that actually is, I wouldn't be bitching as much. It's counter intuitive, but it is exactly 100% true backed up by every statistic imaginable.

No. It isn't. Not even close. Not even a smidgen of close. Not backed up by any statistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. It isn't. Not even close. Not even a smidgen of close. Not backed up by any statistic.

The above says so. Just cause you keep repeating doesn't make it true.

45% red-zone scoring percentage, 20th in the league versus 6th in attempts means you suck at scoring and you are incredibly inefficient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL. You have about as much football logic and sense as a brick.

Of course it's the offense's fault. The defense can't turn over the ball. They don't have it. They can only take it away and give it to the defense. They can only help an offense out.

An offense can turn it over and kill a defense. I know this is difficult for you to figure this one out, but do try.

... If you would take a break from raging at Cam because you're mad about... whatever, you wouldn't make such embarrassing Freudian slips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing wrong with starting to look for bodies early. It's a long injury filled season. I doubt we get through unscathed. 
    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...