Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Very unlikely that the Colts will go 0-16


TheOracle

Recommended Posts

lol wonder if the Panthers will be able to afford two number ones (if they work out) in a few years on top of Cams next contract.

#1 and #2 pick in 2012

#1 and #2 pick in 2013

equals

Andrew Luck

Extra #1 pick in 2013 rookie contract would expire 2 years after Newton's rookie contract is up. This was the trade proposal was being projected by NFL geeks, not me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#1 and #2 pick in 2012

#1 and #2 pick in 2013

equals

Andrew Luck

Extra #1 pick in 2013 rookie contract would expire 2 years after Newton's rookie contract is up. This was the trade proposal was being projected by NFL geeks, not me.

yeah, I understand what draft the picks will come in. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's ridiculous logic. 0-16 is 0-16. Only one 0-10 team that had to go 0-6 to finish the season 0-16 ever did, which makes it very unlikely that the Colts also will. The reason why only one has is because they all started playing HARDER to avoid doing so, like the Colts will do this week.

The Colts don't want to go 0-16, so as the Season winds down, expect them to play harder to avoid 0-16. This is a game they feel like they SHOULD WIN, and they think it's critical to avoid 0-16. If they lose this one to a "2-8" team at home, it'll crush them, and they'll feel like 0-16 is guaranteed.

Therefore, expect the Colts to play this game harder than any other one than the last one if they enter Week 17 sitting at 0-15.

Again, your reasoning is flawed.

clearly you don't understand the concept

With each game they lose, the chances of them going 0-16 goes up. It's quite simple actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rumors are the team is in fact done with Ikem. So it was going to be a LT, just depended on which one got to them at 19. 
    • I have not read the entire thread, and I realize this is fluff to a degree, but it was recorded in real time.  Here are 10 things that stood out to me: 1. Morgan wrote down (before day 3) the first three day 3 picks.  (Lee, Hecht, and Wheatley).  I was never fond of the Morgan hiring as GM.  I thought he was a lazy selection and I questioned his ability to match wits with some of the best GMs in the NFL.  Not any more. Morgan OWNED this draft.  He knew which players were good fits and when they would be bargains, and he got bargains.  I am thoroughly excited about every player. 2. Canales said (about Hecht, a 5th rounder):  "He has a real chance to start."   Morgan said the same thing about Freeling. While I do not expect either to start day 1, it looks to me like we drafted 40% of our starting OL in 2026.  I think we will sign Ickey to a deal and play him at RG, allowing us to escape the Robert Hunt contract in 2027.  Of course that is conditional, and Ickey could replace Moton instead, but if he fully recovers, we are looking at a better RG/RT than he was a LT--which was average.  3. When Morgan said to second-round DT Hunter, "Ready to play beside Derrick Brown?"  Based on personalities, one calm and soft spoken (for the Most part, Brown is) and the other talkative and openly enthusiastic, it reminded me of Brentson Buckner and Kris Jenkins.   4.  Perhaps the steal of the draft was Tennessee WR Chris Brazzell II.  Clearly the Panthers felt that they passed on him when they took Hunter in round 2.  They mentioned his skill set (able to attack on "all three levels.")  This sent me back to watching film. He has speed, hands, and he produced without a great QB. I think he could be great in the NFL.  When  5. Tepper was a bit more involved than I would like, but he seems to be very confident in Morgan.  If I were the owner, I would be doing the same thing.  Canales was also somewhat of a background character--everyone understood his role and stayed in his lane.   6.  I am also very interested in the quantitative analytics aspect of the draft room.  (something like, "He has a 94% chance of being there at pick 55, and a 38% chance of being there at 87). I would like to know their formula, because it seemed to be spot on. 7.  BPA?  Not really.  They had a shopping list and seemed to be targeting the players they selected. I realize other players were edited out, but I was impressed how they knew, by round, who they wanted and if there were multiple options sitting there, they traded back. 8.  Evero (I think) called Lee a candidate that would serve as the "#3 CB."  Morgan describes his size as a plus (Long). Strong praise for a 4th rounder.  If so, we have Thornton coming off injury who played well as an UDFA rookie and they will battle it out to become Jackson's replacement after the 2026 season, assuming the Panthers do not extend him (he turns 30 in 7 months.O 9.  I think we could realistically see every one of these draft picks play this season, and I believe most could start by next year--Realistically, Freeling, Hunter, Hecht, and Brazzell could all be starting or key rotational pieces this year.  I see Lee and Wheatley getting special teams reps and both could be used this season more than expected.   10.  Kuwatch seemed to be predetermined with the final pick, probably because he can add something special to special teams.   He and Bam Martin Scott will fight it out for the 4th ILB position, so it will probably come down to special teams--and Kuwatch stands out there.  Imagine an ILB with a 46.5 vertical (not a typo) on the FG block team.  Kuwatch has an 8.85 RAS score vs. Martin-Scott's 7.5.  
    • They did mention Bain as the pick if he fell but didnt seem confident that would be the case. 
×
×
  • Create New...