Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 12 updated statistics rankings

teeray

By teeray,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Smitharound Newbie

Smitharound

Posted
Posted

1. So you respond to my post with that's exactly what you said then say you never actually said that? :lol:

2. It isn't a strawman. I wasn't exactly sure if your original argument was only points matter, hence me asking. You first saying you said that then saying you didn't is the problem.

Dude you are a child. Everyone can see you twisted that poo around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chef17 Apprentice

chef17

Posted
Posted

Dude you are a child. Everyone can see you twisted that poo around.

What exactly did I twist? I asked if your original argument was only points matter to which you responded "That is EXACTLY what I said". If you never said that then I was incorrect. But don't say you said something then say you never actually said it. That is a problem on your part not mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

So you write books arguing with me because you don't care? And you are under the wrong assumption that I can't be banned. I believe you are fooling yourself there and I also don't believe you speak for everybody. Once again if Zod wanted me banned he would have. Last time Zod responded to me he didn't say anything along the lines of what you are saying. I also do not believe you speak for everybody.

If you come to my forum I promise you I can ban you definitively in a second and you won't be coming back more than once or twice if I really want to. Zod can do the same thing if he so chooses.

Again you didn't answer the question. Why come on here obsessively day after day when you you have banned from here several times already today. What do you get out of it???

Why doesn't Zod ban you permanently?? I can't speak for him but I suspect he finds your trolling amusing and your obsessive posts boost the post counts. Plus this message board is one of the loosest controlled site I have seen. I can't imagine you would last anywhere else.

Again why come back here obsessively??

Answer the question if you can.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Collaborator

teeray

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Now Teeray I believe you can answer this since we were among the first to argue with him. Wasn't his original argument that yards aren't important only points are and that our offense was bad because we were top ten in yards but not points?

If I remember correctly I think PFFL started out saying basically that "yards don't matter only points do".

To be fair to PFFL he talked about YPP from the beginning in a round about way without actually referencing it.

He would say something to the effect of 'We average close to 400 yards a game but only score 22 points per game so we are being inefficient on offense."

That eventually evolved into this YPP debate. So he was talking about it without referencing it. I am sure he would tell you that was what he was talking about from the beginning or it could have been something he just stumbled upon to try to reinforce his point. For the first week of this debate he didn't even understand how it was calculated so.......

I didn't get into it too bad with him until he continued to say that YPP is offensive efficiency and also after he berated me for using things like DVOA and Expected Points Added as offensive efficiency.

And it hasn't stopped since. :nonod:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chef17 Apprentice

chef17

Posted
Posted

If I remember correctly I think PFFL started out saying basically that "yards don't matter only points do".

To be fair to PFFL he talked about YPP from the beginning in a round about way without actually referencing it.

He would say something to the effect of 'We average close to 400 yards a game but only score 22 points per game so we are being inefficient on offense."

That eventually evolved into this YPP debate. So he was talking about it without referencing it. I am sure he would tell you that was what he was talking about from the beginning.

I didn't get into it too bad with him until he continued to say that YPP is offensive efficiency and also after he berated me for using things like DVOA and Expected Points Added as offensive efficiency.

And it hasn't stopped since. :nonod:

That is what I thought also. Apparently that is exactly what he said but somehow he also never actually said that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Statos Newbie

Statos

Posted
Posted

I am impressed with PFFL's ability to come up with new names. MichaelJackson was his low point though.

Maybe he was watching "This Is It" while he was trying to come up with a new name.

Actually I love Michael Jackson and if I was listening to something it would be this:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • carpanfan96
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By carpanfan96 · Posted

      Rumors are the team is in fact done with Ikem. So it was going to be a LT, just depended on which one got to them at 19. 
    • The Third Reich
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By The Third Reich · Posted

      I have not read the entire thread, and I realize this is fluff to a degree, but it was recorded in real time.  Here are 10 things that stood out to me: 1. Morgan wrote down (before day 3) the first three day 3 picks.  (Lee, Hecht, and Wheatley).  I was never fond of the Morgan hiring as GM.  I thought he was a lazy selection and I questioned his ability to match wits with some of the best GMs in the NFL.  Not any more. Morgan OWNED this draft.  He knew which players were good fits and when they would be bargains, and he got bargains.  I am thoroughly excited about every player. 2. Canales said (about Hecht, a 5th rounder):  "He has a real chance to start."   Morgan said the same thing about Freeling. While I do not expect either to start day 1, it looks to me like we drafted 40% of our starting OL in 2026.  I think we will sign Ickey to a deal and play him at RG, allowing us to escape the Robert Hunt contract in 2027.  Of course that is conditional, and Ickey could replace Moton instead, but if he fully recovers, we are looking at a better RG/RT than he was a LT--which was average.  3. When Morgan said to second-round DT Hunter, "Ready to play beside Derrick Brown?"  Based on personalities, one calm and soft spoken (for the Most part, Brown is) and the other talkative and openly enthusiastic, it reminded me of Brentson Buckner and Kris Jenkins.   4.  Perhaps the steal of the draft was Tennessee WR Chris Brazzell II.  Clearly the Panthers felt that they passed on him when they took Hunter in round 2.  They mentioned his skill set (able to attack on "all three levels.")  This sent me back to watching film. He has speed, hands, and he produced without a great QB. I think he could be great in the NFL.  When  5. Tepper was a bit more involved than I would like, but he seems to be very confident in Morgan.  If I were the owner, I would be doing the same thing.  Canales was also somewhat of a background character--everyone understood his role and stayed in his lane.   6.  I am also very interested in the quantitative analytics aspect of the draft room.  (something like, "He has a 94% chance of being there at pick 55, and a 38% chance of being there at 87). I would like to know their formula, because it seemed to be spot on. 7.  BPA?  Not really.  They had a shopping list and seemed to be targeting the players they selected. I realize other players were edited out, but I was impressed how they knew, by round, who they wanted and if there were multiple options sitting there, they traded back. 8.  Evero (I think) called Lee a candidate that would serve as the "#3 CB."  Morgan describes his size as a plus (Long). Strong praise for a 4th rounder.  If so, we have Thornton coming off injury who played well as an UDFA rookie and they will battle it out to become Jackson's replacement after the 2026 season, assuming the Panthers do not extend him (he turns 30 in 7 months.O 9.  I think we could realistically see every one of these draft picks play this season, and I believe most could start by next year--Realistically, Freeling, Hunter, Hecht, and Brazzell could all be starting or key rotational pieces this year.  I see Lee and Wheatley getting special teams reps and both could be used this season more than expected.   10.  Kuwatch seemed to be predetermined with the final pick, probably because he can add something special to special teams.   He and Bam Martin Scott will fight it out for the 4th ILB position, so it will probably come down to special teams--and Kuwatch stands out there.  Imagine an ILB with a 46.5 vertical (not a typo) on the FG block team.  Kuwatch has an 8.85 RAS score vs. Martin-Scott's 7.5.  
    • thunderraiden
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By thunderraiden · Posted

      They did mention Bain as the pick if he fell but didnt seem confident that would be the case. 
×
×
  • Create New...