Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive Yards For Individual Players Thus Far..


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

***STATS UPDATED THROUGH 12/24/11

Didn't include everyone, just the main cast for relevant yards on Offense. We have some pretty decent numbers so far. ;)

Passing

3,893 Cam 20 TD : 16 INT

Rushing

783 Dwill

682 Jstew

674 Cam

*Running back have combined for 1,465 yards for the season so far*

*Cam has so many rushing yards I basically count him as another back. So, Running backs and Cam have combined for 2,139 yards*

Recieving

1,308 Smith

586 LaFell

540 Olsen

467 Naanee

437 Shockey

* Tight Ends have combined for 977 Receiving Yards thus far*

..and if anyone wants to add stats for other players or wants to do the same thing for the defense feel free. I plan on doing one of these things after our last game, should be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just funny that you use scoring efficiency to point to why we win a game, yet we lost a game once this year where we were the more efficient team. It takes more than just scoring efficiency to win games.

It also takes some defensive effort, which is why we lost against Detroit but have won the last couple weeks (whether that is really because our D has played better, or the offenses we've played the last two weeks have been abysmally bad, well, that's another thing entirely).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't try to use single stats to predict wins and losses, I watch the games. Anyone who watches our games can tell you that calling our defense average is an insult to the majority of the defenses in this league. Our defense is awful. If I wanted to use a small sampling of stats to try to determine the quality of an offense or defense, I'd probably use drive stats, while factoring in field position.

our offense, even when it is more efficient than other team's offenses, doesn't always win because our defense gives up late leads due to injuries, lack of depth, lack of talent... whatever you want to blame it on.

That's my point. Our offense is largely fine. It's been fine all year...

Yeah so basically it's only been good 11 out of 12 times? 92%:rolleyes:

Turnovers have been 12-12. 100%

And yards have predicted the right winner how many times?

I must be missing the part where your argument makes a good point.

PS: What would have the Saint's efficiency been without the "free" 3 points...like I said yards per points takes into account everything..even bad coaching.

1) The reason it's "been good" 11/12 teams is that typically the team that scores the most points will have the better YPP... but not always. Weirdly enough, when a team scores the most points in a game, it wins...!!!! who would have thought!?

2) Turnovers have been 12-12 huh? Strange, I didn't know we'd had any tie games!

You're right that YPP takes into account everything, even bad coaching, hence how silly it is to apply it to an offense alone. But we've had this discussion before...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our offense was largely fine today. It hasn't been largely fine because every game they have been inefficient we have lost. And they have been inefficient.

So wait, what is inefficient? Is it being higher than the league average? Because we were pretty f'ing efficient vs Detroit but we lost. Is it being more efficient than the opposing team? Because we lost a game where that was the case, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our defense seems to be getting better as season goes on but lets face it we been killed on defense with injuries. Wish it wasn't so but" it is what it is" to quote our late coach.

This whole season coulda shoulda been better but it didn't but future looks bright.

I think its called The Cusp and sure hope we there.

Been a fan befor we had a team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
    • Sign him up. I am willing to bet he wouldn't finish a game with -2 yards.
    • He is just fuging limited in every way.  On one hand, and nfl player, you would want to bulk them up so long as it doesn’t limit their mobility, elasticity, flexibility, ROM, or dynamicism - as is the concern with bulking up.  But the issue with that is, you would be worried about that when a guy has those traits to begin with.  Bryce is a very average athlete with a weak arm.  So if you’re not gonna be a great athlete with a strong arm, bulk up.  And if you can’t or won’t bulk up, find another fuging profession that doesn’t require athleticism and arm strength.  You’re built like a bitch AND aren’t a great athlete - you can’t be subpar in both categories…  well, unless you play for the Panthers apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...