Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SI's Jim Trotter ranks Cam the 9th best QB in the league

CatMan72

By CatMan72,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

Based on their logic that The Golden Calf of Bristol can be a great QB (even though his status SUCK) just because his team wins.....I guess we should rank Starks from Green Bay the best RB in the league. He is the starting RB on an undefeated team....and ranking a players ability at a position is ONLY made by W/L of his team.

What a joke.

If you think that's a valid comparison, you should stop watching sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

How else could you rate QB's? I can only think of production (efficiency with TD:INT and rushing) vs. W/L.

Phillip Rivers is a better QB than MANY that have put in better 2011 seasons thus far. Simple and plain. There are reasons Rivers has struggled most of this season.

Alex Smith would rank ahead of Rivers if you are just looking at 2011 production.

Rivers is a better QB than Smith and would rank above him if you were just going to rank them......say entering next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

If you think that's a valid comparison, you should stop watching sports.

If you think that it is NOT a valid comparison, you should do us all a favor and die.

John Starks has as much to do with GB winning as does The Golden Calf of Bristol.

Every game (other than the Vikings game), he has played like TOTAL poo for 57 minutes. His defense and running game has made up for his total lack of passing ability to keep them in games.

He is magic with his legs in the last 3 minutes of game.....too bad he is a liability and a joke of a QB for the fiest 57 minutes of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

I just want you to know that you did a terrible job with your analogy.

I just want you to know that you did a terrible job at EVERY thread you started or post you have made.

You are to this MB as The Golden Calf of Bristol is to the QB position....a joke.

That is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gin and Juice Newbie

Gin and Juice

Posted
Posted

I just want you to know that you did a terrible job at EVERY thread you started or post you have made.

You are to this MB as The Golden Calf of Bristol is to the QB position....a joke.

That is all.

Guys, not taking up for him, but he didn't even say anything about the article. He is smarter than even thinking that is close to a credible list.

lol, he just shows up and people jump him before he states an opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...