Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quick Tebow thread


lightsout

Recommended Posts

The The Golden Calf of Bristol Mania is not over. What you will hear all week is "how does The Golden Calf of Bristol respond next week after this loss to the Patriots?"

Also, Skip Bayless will blame the defense for the loss, after not giving them NEAR enough credit for the wins the Broncos have with The Golden Calf of Bristol at QB.

Discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well to be fair he did put up 23 points and many of us were defending our quarterback for that even though we ended up losing.

The Golden Calf of Bristol was part of their loss but was certainly not the sole reason.

I think being down, having to throw the football, and being so jittery in the pocket that the OL can't block because you're moving so much for no reason, and then when you do throw a pass, it's so far off the mark there isn't even a player around it, constitutes as a sole reason. Half his completions came off of one drive. That's...pretty bad. Sure, The Golden Calf of Bristol isn't the reason WHY they lost, but he is a large contributing factor, because they didn't have time to run the ball with how much they were down.

Who runs backwards 20 yards and takes the sack? Who?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

read-option and power running didn't work against the lions, it didn't work against new england and it's not going to work against high powered offenses most of the time

The Golden Calf of Bristol is going to have to learn how to become a better passer and throw from the pocket more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only watched the first half but thought The Golden Calf of Bristol actually looked good this game. He started off hot and was hitting his receivers, although not with the greatest of spirals.

read-option and power running didn't work against the lions, it didn't work against new england and it's not going to work against high powered offenses most of the time

And I am not sure what you mean by this, Denver ran the ball effectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they had like half their rushing yards in the first quarter alone tho, so even though they had 250, most of it was in the first half I thought.

but The Golden Calf of Bristol looked good in the first quarter and a half... but the Patriots poured a ton of points on them in the second quarter, and the defense couldn't stop them late in the fourth when it looked like The Golden Calf of Bristol Time might rise again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only watched the first half but thought The Golden Calf of Bristol actually looked good this game. He started off hot and was hitting his receivers, although not with the greatest of spirals.

And I am not sure what you mean by this, Denver ran the ball effectively.

um, it didn't give them the win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, but you said it was because of their run game. I am not sure that was the problem. The whole team didn't play well, including their strongpoint, the defense. And the back to back fumbles didn't help either.

what part of "three yards and a cloud of dust cannot keep pace with a bona fide arsenal of passing formations and a great QB" are you not getting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nah he made a lot of costly mistakes, but honestly, when the game was close he was producing. I have a hard time really blaming him for the loss though obviously he deserves some blame... FWIW, I haven't blamed Cam for many of our losses either.

That's because Cam wasn't responsible for many of the team loses. It seem many were quite happy to find something else he wasn't doing good enough to complain about.

The difference between Cam and Tim is, the receivers are already being blamed for Tim's not playing better. The receivers were fine when Tim was coming to work 5 minutes before the end of every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well to be fair he did put up 23 points and many of us were defending our quarterback for that even though we ended up losing.

The Golden Calf of Bristol was part of their loss but was certainly not the sole reason.

But...But...But...How come when the Panthers lose, everyone is looking for ways to put the blame on your QB's back. The endless ranting over his ints and whatever else they can blame him for is amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...